Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Darras's avatar

One must notice few things:

1. Poutine proposed a defensive treaty to Iran. As strong and tight that those with North Korea( Poutine's words), an it's Pezeskian who refused it, even after the 12 Days war. Pezeskian even refused Chinese and Russian military

help after this war.

2. If Russia didn't help "resistance-axis", one must considerate that Pezeskian's Iran let it die and even helped Israel to destroy it. Shall we remind that Hamas's head was assassinated in Teheran 3 weeks after Pezeskian election. Election that came after the deadly "accident" of previous president back from.... Azerbaijan.... Iran didn't move at all when Hezbollah was decisively attacked and the circumstances of bombing of Nasrallah is very suspicious.

More, Iran gave all its place to rebels in Syria without fighting.

3. If they were no russian nor chinese intention to deter USA in those Naval exercise, it probably explain the delay of US attack. Bombing Iran yes, risking WW3 no.

4. It's probably an US snafu to plan this operation without taking into account the presence of chinese and russian navies even if programmed one year ago.

This delay, let time to USA to put pressure among the undecideds in the state apparatus.

Exactly like in Syria and Venezuela: maximum pressure and threat to make collapse the house of card if it's not very strong

Tony Long's avatar

I suppose Russia would survive with a "balkanized' Iran to the south. But it would survive as a country increasingly surrounded by an aggressive United States (and its NATO satraps). The Americans are in the Caucasus, they're in Central Asia, and they're messing around with Belarus. Mr. Putin needs to understand the Americans are not now, and will never be, reliable partners, let alone friends. The lion will not lie down with the lamb. So the lamb better grow a spine, and fast.

33 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?