8 Comments
User's avatar
Chris's avatar

A bridge too far. West can move pawns on Caspian chessboard during these two "special operations" , but afterwards Iran and/or Russia can smash the chessboard entirely (call it a reset if you want to be diplomatic).

RicoBravo's avatar

Power, like nature, abhors a vacuum. Hence the US/Israeli/Western influence flows in as Russian/Persian recedes.

Feral Finster's avatar

"Speculation has accordingly swirled about what exactly Israel aimed to achieve by doing so other than dealing as much damage to Iran as possible.".

I don't need to speculate. The Israeli goal is to turn Iran into a failed state, much as was done to Iraq, Syria and Libya.

Andrew Korybko's avatar

Understood, but how exactly would destroying the Caspian Fleet accomplish that? It only serves a deterrence purpose vis-a-vis preventing the Trans-Caspian Pipeline from being built and some decades ago in a standoff with Azerbaijan over an offshore oil or gas field.

Darras's avatar

For Israel, it seems that is "all that is destroyed, is not to destroy". A ship is a sitting duck. Israel makes turkey shot on what it can

Feral Finster's avatar

Anything that prevents the Iranian government from making money. See, e.g., seizure of oilfields in Syria.

Walter DuBlanica's avatar

The Caspian Sea joins Russia & Iran. How far Israel plans to expand into the Caspian Sea remains to be seen. USA is concerned abourt relations with Russia a nuclear super Porew just like the USA. Isreal is CRAZY, the USA is sober about relations with Russia.

Michael's avatar

Eventually, those ships have been used to secure a stable exchange of goods, the ammos inclusively.