Korybko To Karaganov: Now’s Not The Time To Once Again Call For Russia To Nuke Europe

His known friendship with Putin, whom he used to advise, could be spun by the Europeans to manipulate Trump into thinking that Putin is already plotting grave violations of a future Ukrainian peace deal, abandon his mediating role as a result, and then escalate the conflict.

Sergey Karaganov, a highly respected Russian expert with prestigious think tank roles who previously advised Yeltsin and Putin, is once again calling for Russia to nuke Europe. He became famous in summer 2023 after RT translated his first article that called for this. He’s back at it again, however, this time modifying his original proposal by suggesting conventional strikes against the European elite after a peace deal with Ukraine before what he believes will be the inevitable second round of the conflict.

He foresees that “If conventional strikes have no effect, and Europe does not capitulate or at least retreat, we should be fully prepared (militarily and, most importantly, politically and psychologically) to launch limited (but sufficient for political effect) retaliatory strikes with strategic nuclear weapons.” Only then will their elite “actually fear us. They should be in terror of us. They should understand that escalating or even continuing the conflict risks their immediate physical destruction”.

Although Karaganov insists that “I am not calling for a nuclear war”, that’s exactly what would follow Russia launching preemptive conventional and even nuclear strikes against Europe, especially in pursuit of his complementary goal of “depriving France and Britain of nuclear weapons”. He makes solid points about how Russia’s restraint has been perceived as weakness by the West, thus leading to more dramatic provocations against it, but overcompensating for this through his proposed means isn’t realistic.

Nobody should doubt his intentions since he’s an indisputable Russian patriot who sincerely loves his country, which is why it pains him deeply to not see its adversaries completely destroyed, but once again calling for Russia to nuke Europe at this sensitive moment in the peace process is counterproductive. Trump overreacted last summer to Medvedev’s much milder nuclear war innuendo so the precedent exists for him to overreact to Karaganov’s explicit call for Russia to nuke Europe after peace with Ukraine.

Trump is capricious, easily offended, and obsessed with humiliating all those who offend him. His attempt to humiliate Medvedev after last summer’s incident, Russia’s former president and Deputy Chair of the Security Council, shows that he wouldn’t think twice about doing the same to Karaganov, who no longer serves in Russian officialdom. This could risk the future of the US’ peace efforts, not to mention possibly inspire Trump to step up US military aid to Ukraine, maybe even finally sending Tomahawks.

Trump likely never heard of Karaganov, but the same Europeans who manipulated him after the Anchorage Summit into backtracking on the understandings that he reached with Putin have, and they could bring Karaganov’s article to Trump’s attention. They might therefore spin Karaganov’s known friendship with Putin to manipulate Trump into thinking that Putin is already plotting grave violations of a future Ukrainian peace deal, abandon his mediating role as a result, and then escalate the conflict.

It was already risky enough that Karaganov recently told Tucker that Russia will nuke Europe if the Ukrainian Conflict continues since that could have been exploited by them for the aforesaid purpose, but it’s altogether different for him to now call for Russia nuking Europe after peace with Ukraine. Karaganov can write whatever he wants, but eschewing calls for Russia to nuke Europe amidst the US-mediated talks with Ukraine would preemptively avert the scenario that was described, so he should consider it.