Ukraine’s gravy train will continue chugging along, fueled by Western taxpayers’ funds, though all this promised aid will only perpetuate the proxy war on Russia instead of ending it.
Excuse me for going off topic but I need to share my sadness.
I already said that months after months, I stopped reading AMC authors. Too much willful thinking, too much complacency, too much inept analysis, dumb theories and wacky predictions.
Just remained less than 5 authors on dozens I read before almost daily and daily for some of them.
That became a desert.
Today, I just decided to stop reading Larry Johnson. Enough is enough. He's not a jester and is an honorable man but, like we say in France, he pays himself with words too much.
It's sad.
Remain just Andrew and Martianov and far below 2 others. That's all.
Feel lonely.
It seems my bad English betrayed me what I wanted to mean is that there is Andrew and Martianov, and far below there are two others.
Martianov is a little Propagandist as well, although very entertaining. Nothing beats Jacques Baud though. I find him wise, calm, insightful and very accurate. Has been right about this conflict before it even started.
Sure, he loves Russia, and he never speaks of what bothering but he's the only one who have almost never mistaken and I've learned many things. He don't bullshit like others AMC jesters.
He hates SITREPS and explain very cleverly why. He hate predictions too. But what he said about balance of change were always right.
For me, the only thing bothering is that he repeats and repeats and repeats the same thing every day: NATO leaders all are morons, NATO generals all are fool incompetents, western university elite is a fraud and a bunch of conformist idiots intoxicated by bullshits and absolutely nobody in west understand what happens military. Day after day, it's boring.
But very interesting.
Jacques Baud id an honest man but , apologies, he never learned me something. It's kind of man who tell you very sententiously, like a lightning analysis : " water is wet" and in front of you grateful face in front of such a genius, he adds " and without betraying my sources, I can assure you that ice is cold".
What he say is what you can hear and read everywhere in OSINT.
I'd respectfully! disagree. Baud taught me that NATO can't fight and this also aligns with Martianov's view. They don't understand modern warfare. Remember the Ukrainian offensive? A German trainer was asked by a Ukrainian soldier what to do about those damn mine fields and the German instructor said, just go around them. Well the entire front line was mined.
The fact that NATO thinks this is about territory, makes them hold on tightly to cities and villages, increasing their losses substantially. If they understood what the Russians are doing they would have a flexible defence. Roll back and counter attack etc. roll back and set up traps. Baud has been very insightful when it comes to the war, I find. But hey, I respect your opinion. I also agree that Martianov is no BS. It's a symbol for entire Russia. No BS. You see what you get. And he's funny as hell.
Yes, but that is what experimental readership is all about - finding reliable sources. Many times you don't know until shortly before the end. For example, the Irish government sent out a note of condolence to German Nazi government on Adolf's demise in early May 1945.
With AMC's complacency - I think many times they just want to tell pleasant things to their readership.
To say something pleasant for your readership, especially when wrong, can have two name:
- bizness
- propaganda.
And these jesters say, tear in eyes, that they do this exhausting job to fight and confront the awful propagande and taste for bizness of MSM.
In France we have a name for that: Tartufe. It's a character of Molière. A miserable hypocrite.
They pretend to the truth and purity and they only are bullshitters and greedy profiteers.
Last week, I reminded to one of them, a French one, the last sentence of Animal Farm, Orwell. When the animals can no more lake a difference between pigs and men.
'Western aid will continue flowing into Ukraine because that bloc has accepted that some of it will be stolen as the price to pay for continuing their proxy war on Russia'. Good point.
Lost wars wreck careers, too.
Every day the war continues European leaders can stay in office. The entire European leadership will be out of office when Ukraine capitulates.
Doesn't matter because the evil fuckers in the West will keep the war going until Ukraine disappears, Russia is forced to nuke everyone or sanity in the West prevails, which it will not.
Never forget that all the political people in Ukraine stayed beyond there legal mandat. They have no right to sign anything. The part of Ukraine which will ruled by Russia will claim that it's debts are odious.
And probably, West will take the Russian founds: 300 billions dollars.
$300B is almost all in Europe, Belgium (mostly), then CH, Austria and UK. I guess there will be a swap for Novorossiya taken by Russian Federation and the $300B permanently taken up by the EU budget,
Thy won't 'take the fund". They'll hold the funds forever and use all the interest and gains for themselves.
That way they can say to the rest of the World, 'look, we didn't steal it. We are using it as leverage because Russia bad. We would never do that to you because you are not bad."
And as it's the banksters which really rule in west, they will agree. Then, they will invest those 300 bls for states and take their commission, then they will grant a loan of 300 more bls dollars to these same states and take interest.
The butter, the money of the butter and the farmer's wife ass.
Nobody in the West gives a shit about Ukrainian corruption, as long as the war can be kept going.
Zelenskii could appoint David Duke (who has Ukrainian ties) as his Head of Diversity Programs and nobody would raise a peep, as long as the army kept fighting.
FWIW, Ukraine has long had a "elite overproduction" problem, and western sponsored NGOs and anticorruption agencies were a good way to soak up those surplus elites.
The evidence is they keep sending more $$$ and not exposing the known corruption. They do it because the people in he West approving that $$$ are in on the corruption. It's one big happy circle jerk.
Where does the lost billions end up? Do you think they are stupid enough to let that information out?
Why do you think Zelensky just passed a law dismantling the anti-corruption boards? is that a coincidence with the announcement of new $$ flowing in? FFS, Ukraine is a cesspool of corruption, like the UN, Olympics, EU and all the same people benefit.
Brian Berletic nails it in "US Still Dangerous Despite Limits of Military Production."
"The strategies of 'division of labor' and 'strategic sequencing' employed by the US, while seemingly pragmatic, are ultimately attempts to manage an unsustainable equation."
"Moreover, the inherent unpredictability of international relations means that a carefully planned “sequence” can be easily disrupted by unforeseen events, potentially leaving the US and its client states vulnerable on multiple fronts. The margins of error continue to narrow, leaving less and less room for contingencies created both by chance and by counter-strategies employed by nations like Russia, China, and Iran individually or working in cooperation."
When the BRIC block can become truly a united, cohesive entity, "contingencies" can be created which can break the U.S. and its partners. Right now, unfortunately, most of these countries are still (1) intimidated by the U.S. and (2) maintaining defensive postures rather thinking offensively. I think largely of Iran in this context.
There are no US weapons to buy..America can barely meet it's own needs in terms of magazine depth, and ramping up production will never make a difference on the battlefield in time.
It's possible. However do you remind what AMC Sayed two years a half before?: " wuhuhu, western weapons will never arrive on the line of contact".
Now , the song is: " wuhuhu West can produce enough weapon"
.
West is able to produce, millions véhicules, included trucks, train, plane, rocket, hélico. West enjoy the ressources of all America, all Africa, Europe and Australia. Sure they will be FUBAR and SNAFU, but ...
Not a peep of the protests here in the US. Nothing in the newspapers either. The oligarchs count money while the regular citizens see their homes bombed or lose their sons,daughters,husbands,& wives in this war. Sounds about right.
Excuse me for going off topic but I need to share my sadness.
I already said that months after months, I stopped reading AMC authors. Too much willful thinking, too much complacency, too much inept analysis, dumb theories and wacky predictions.
Just remained less than 5 authors on dozens I read before almost daily and daily for some of them.
That became a desert.
Today, I just decided to stop reading Larry Johnson. Enough is enough. He's not a jester and is an honorable man but, like we say in France, he pays himself with words too much.
It's sad.
Remain just Andrew and Martianov and far below 2 others. That's all.
Feel lonely.
It seems my bad English betrayed me what I wanted to mean is that there is Andrew and Martianov, and far below there are two others.
I figured it out a long time ago. I wish I were wrong.
Martianov is a little Propagandist as well, although very entertaining. Nothing beats Jacques Baud though. I find him wise, calm, insightful and very accurate. Has been right about this conflict before it even started.
Sure, he loves Russia, and he never speaks of what bothering but he's the only one who have almost never mistaken and I've learned many things. He don't bullshit like others AMC jesters.
He hates SITREPS and explain very cleverly why. He hate predictions too. But what he said about balance of change were always right.
For me, the only thing bothering is that he repeats and repeats and repeats the same thing every day: NATO leaders all are morons, NATO generals all are fool incompetents, western university elite is a fraud and a bunch of conformist idiots intoxicated by bullshits and absolutely nobody in west understand what happens military. Day after day, it's boring.
But very interesting.
Jacques Baud id an honest man but , apologies, he never learned me something. It's kind of man who tell you very sententiously, like a lightning analysis : " water is wet" and in front of you grateful face in front of such a genius, he adds " and without betraying my sources, I can assure you that ice is cold".
What he say is what you can hear and read everywhere in OSINT.
Absolutely none interest.
I'd respectfully! disagree. Baud taught me that NATO can't fight and this also aligns with Martianov's view. They don't understand modern warfare. Remember the Ukrainian offensive? A German trainer was asked by a Ukrainian soldier what to do about those damn mine fields and the German instructor said, just go around them. Well the entire front line was mined.
The fact that NATO thinks this is about territory, makes them hold on tightly to cities and villages, increasing their losses substantially. If they understood what the Russians are doing they would have a flexible defence. Roll back and counter attack etc. roll back and set up traps. Baud has been very insightful when it comes to the war, I find. But hey, I respect your opinion. I also agree that Martianov is no BS. It's a symbol for entire Russia. No BS. You see what you get. And he's funny as hell.
Thank you for your open mind. It's really really rare .
I don't say that Baud is bad but considering my others sources, he learn me nothing.
Martianov can be funny but he is bloody irascible 😂
Passionate man, he is 😅
Who's AMC?
AMC = Alt Media Community.
Yes, but that is what experimental readership is all about - finding reliable sources. Many times you don't know until shortly before the end. For example, the Irish government sent out a note of condolence to German Nazi government on Adolf's demise in early May 1945.
With AMC's complacency - I think many times they just want to tell pleasant things to their readership.
To say something pleasant for your readership, especially when wrong, can have two name:
- bizness
- propaganda.
And these jesters say, tear in eyes, that they do this exhausting job to fight and confront the awful propagande and taste for bizness of MSM.
In France we have a name for that: Tartufe. It's a character of Molière. A miserable hypocrite.
They pretend to the truth and purity and they only are bullshitters and greedy profiteers.
Last week, I reminded to one of them, a French one, the last sentence of Animal Farm, Orwell. When the animals can no more lake a difference between pigs and men.
"though all this promised aid will only perpetuate the proxy war on Russia instead of ending it".
I think that's the whole point of this aid...
Yes, most likely, but maintaining it indefinitely could prove challenging and ultimately be counterproductive.
From whose perspective?
'Western aid will continue flowing into Ukraine because that bloc has accepted that some of it will be stolen as the price to pay for continuing their proxy war on Russia'. Good point.
Lost wars wreck careers, too.
Every day the war continues European leaders can stay in office. The entire European leadership will be out of office when Ukraine capitulates.
Ukraine will disappear from the map. It will end up being Russia, at least the part east of the Dnieper.
It's a wish? A prediction? A probability? A divination?
A fact. Russia will simply have to take that territory because anything less will be too hard to defend. They will want and need that moat from NATO.
There are others alternatives which avoid to Russia to pay everything.
Doesn't matter because the evil fuckers in the West will keep the war going until Ukraine disappears, Russia is forced to nuke everyone or sanity in the West prevails, which it will not.
How will Ukraine pay back these hundreds of billions in loans when it ceases to exist?
(but I think that's the ultimate plan)
Ukraine is not expected to ever pay back. No-one expected UK or Soviet Union to pay back after WW2. It was just on the books.
Of course they are expected to pay back. It's the whole reason for the charade of a loan in the first place.
No one with a modicum common sense believes that money will be paid back, but the sales job by those warmongers is that it will be paid back.
Nobody cares.
Exactly like Irak after Saddam Hussein.
Never forget that all the political people in Ukraine stayed beyond there legal mandat. They have no right to sign anything. The part of Ukraine which will ruled by Russia will claim that it's debts are odious.
And probably, West will take the Russian founds: 300 billions dollars.
.
$300B is almost all in Europe, Belgium (mostly), then CH, Austria and UK. I guess there will be a swap for Novorossiya taken by Russian Federation and the $300B permanently taken up by the EU budget,
Thy won't 'take the fund". They'll hold the funds forever and use all the interest and gains for themselves.
That way they can say to the rest of the World, 'look, we didn't steal it. We are using it as leverage because Russia bad. We would never do that to you because you are not bad."
Ok, they will be able to put those 300 bls in warranty to get a loan paid by the interests.
It's exactly the same, without stolen it formally.
And as it's the banksters which really rule in west, they will agree. Then, they will invest those 300 bls for states and take their commission, then they will grant a loan of 300 more bls dollars to these same states and take interest.
The butter, the money of the butter and the farmer's wife ass.
Nobody in the West gives a shit about Ukrainian corruption, as long as the war can be kept going.
Zelenskii could appoint David Duke (who has Ukrainian ties) as his Head of Diversity Programs and nobody would raise a peep, as long as the army kept fighting.
FWIW, Ukraine has long had a "elite overproduction" problem, and western sponsored NGOs and anticorruption agencies were a good way to soak up those surplus elites.
Not wrong, the old Principe: " he is a son of a bitch. But he is OUR son of a bitch".
I disagree. Everyone in the bureaucracy in the West cares deeply about the corruption in Ukraine. In fact, thy are counting on it!
I've seen no evidence of same.
The evidence is they keep sending more $$$ and not exposing the known corruption. They do it because the people in he West approving that $$$ are in on the corruption. It's one big happy circle jerk.
They keep sending $$ because the army keeps fighting. You have presented no evidence that money returns in the form of kickbacks.
Where does the lost billions end up? Do you think they are stupid enough to let that information out?
Why do you think Zelensky just passed a law dismantling the anti-corruption boards? is that a coincidence with the announcement of new $$ flowing in? FFS, Ukraine is a cesspool of corruption, like the UN, Olympics, EU and all the same people benefit.
You assume facts not in evidence. In fact, your entire response consists of assuming facts not in evidence.
BTW, if you think that either Zelenskii or any independent anticorruption board is going to call out corruption, then I have a bridge to sell you.
Brian Berletic nails it in "US Still Dangerous Despite Limits of Military Production."
"The strategies of 'division of labor' and 'strategic sequencing' employed by the US, while seemingly pragmatic, are ultimately attempts to manage an unsustainable equation."
"Moreover, the inherent unpredictability of international relations means that a carefully planned “sequence” can be easily disrupted by unforeseen events, potentially leaving the US and its client states vulnerable on multiple fronts. The margins of error continue to narrow, leaving less and less room for contingencies created both by chance and by counter-strategies employed by nations like Russia, China, and Iran individually or working in cooperation."
When the BRIC block can become truly a united, cohesive entity, "contingencies" can be created which can break the U.S. and its partners. Right now, unfortunately, most of these countries are still (1) intimidated by the U.S. and (2) maintaining defensive postures rather thinking offensively. I think largely of Iran in this context.
https://journal-neo.su/2025/07/09/us-still-dangerous-despite-limits-of-military-production/
🇺🇦 Zelensky’s War Has Entered a New Phase—And It’s Not Against Russia
🧨 Anti-corruption agencies dismantled
⚠️ U.S. allies call for his replacement
🔥 Protests erupt in Kyiv and beyond
❓ Is Ukraine entering the post-Zelensky era?
Read the full analysis: https://leonvermeulen.substack.com/p/zelensky-corruption-and-the-
😂😂😂
Haven't you shame to come here for making soliciting: " hey honey, come home, I have a hot analysis for you".
Incredible.
There are no US weapons to buy..America can barely meet it's own needs in terms of magazine depth, and ramping up production will never make a difference on the battlefield in time.
Watch out sir,
It's possible. However do you remind what AMC Sayed two years a half before?: " wuhuhu, western weapons will never arrive on the line of contact".
Now , the song is: " wuhuhu West can produce enough weapon"
.
West is able to produce, millions véhicules, included trucks, train, plane, rocket, hélico. West enjoy the ressources of all America, all Africa, Europe and Australia. Sure they will be FUBAR and SNAFU, but ...
So I beware
Not a peep of the protests here in the US. Nothing in the newspapers either. The oligarchs count money while the regular citizens see their homes bombed or lose their sons,daughters,husbands,& wives in this war. Sounds about right.