This could be averted if Poland, which commands NATO’s third-largest army and whose new president recently didn’t rule out talking to Putin if his country’s security depended on it, doesn’t allow itself to be manipulated into partaking in any related provocations or backing up those responsible for them.
NATO magnifying issues relating to straying Russian fighter jets and drones? Total hypocrisy!!
USA and UK, in particular, have been overflying foreign sovereign territories for decades without criticism from Western sources. What individual NATO countries should be doing is critically considering their individual risk vs benefit of probable consequences for supporting provocations of Russia and Belorussia. NATO executives hide behind their desks as they put the future of the entire Euro region in jeopardy. Arguments about border issues that originated 80 years ago are irrelevant and must be left as history and a thing of the past.
It's there. Maria Zakharova has spoken on these subjects. Not that the fully owned, fully controlled, fully manipulated, and fully propagandized US media will report on it.
Isn’t that the goal of every action NATO takes? And why can’t the Trump administration seem to understand? The globalist goal is to destroy Russia, that’s why they provoked this war.
No, no, it's not the same thing. Concerning the UK bomb, it's a treaty from 1942 between UK and USA which subordinate the UK employ of its own bomb to the acceptance of USA. It's notorious.
The French Constitution forbid to share the french nuclear deterrence. So, the president can't share it by himself. He need a constitutionnel change.
For doing it, he must gather the whole Congress, that mean Assembly ( 600 representants) and the Senat.( 300 senator) in a solemn vote and grab the 2/3 of vote.
Therefore, can you imagine a 11% rating president with less than 35% of representants and 15% of senators succeed in such a thing that french people would consider as a crime.
Even use our nuclear weapon to protect another state is forbidden by the Constitution.
It can only be use for protect french territory or if state is about to collapse after an attack( nuclear or not).
Reason why I find stupid the AMC subtleties about Oreschnik saying that as it's not a nuclear weapon, a enemy stroke with it will not retaliate with nuke.
I can assure you that if Russia send an Oreschnik on Elysée or a nuclear power plant, France, with its small arms will do all it's possible to send some big nuclear shots on Russia.
Poland now realizes the risks of confrontation with Russia. Polands biggest enemy was Germany. Russia fought back when they invaded Russian territory. Poles need to realize that their biggest enemy was Germany which hated all Slavic people.
Ha yes? They, like Germans, killed 6 millions Poles? Did they treat them, like Germans did, as serfs?
Did they , like German did, killed systematically every intellectual worker?
When the awful communists and horrible Russians leaved in 1990, Poles were not well educated? Not in good sanitary situation? Starving? With no infrastructure? No own industry?
You're right, terrible communists and Russians in deed.
" In June 1944, units of the Home Army cooperated with the Red Army in the battles for Vilnius, Lviv, Lublin and other towns and cities. After this short period of cooperation, the Polish units were disarmed, officers arrested and those soldiers who refused to join the communist-controlled military were interned. Soviet repressions against the Polish underground continued throughout the following months. About 40,000 soldiers and Polish Underground State officials were deported deep into the Soviet Union. Thousands of others were repressed by the developing communist structures.
In 1945 about 40,000 - 50,000 people from Polish territories were deported to forced labour camps in the USSR, most of them from Upper Silesia. Until 1947, units of the NKVD were stationed in Poland and participated in battles against the anti-communist underground. The biggest operation of Soviet forces was the Augustów roundup in July 1945, during which over 7000 people were arrested and almost 700 killed.
The system of forced labour camps was established in 1945 and by 1950 there were 206 camps on Polish territory. The number of inmates is estimated at around 300,000. The last camps were closed in 1958. The number of political prison sentences between 1944 - 1956 is unknown, though at one point there were up to 50,000 political prisoners in the system. In the aforementioned time period, about 3,500 death sentences were imposed for political reasons, of which over 2,500 were carried out. On top of that, over 20,000 inmates died in prisons and labour camps. The overall number of victims of the 1944-1956 period is estimated at around 50,000.
About 100 different laws served as the foundation for these large-scale repressions. In addition to imprisonment and forced labour, administrative punishments such as fees and arrests were also widely used. Within just a few years, between 1952-1955, over half a million peasants were given such punishments because they did not give their compulsory shares in produce to the authorities.
As a result of the 1956 amnesty, most political inmates were released. In the following years, political trials were not as commonplace, only a few tens to a few hundreds were sentenced annually. The repressions usually only increased in response to demonstrations and protests. For example, after the protests in Nowa Huta (1960) almost 500 people were arrested, out of which 87 were sentenced to prison while 119 were fined. During the strikes and demonstrations in March 1968, over 2,500 people were arrested, and 540 criminal investigations were launched. In December 1970, over 3,000 people were arrested. In June 1976, the number of arrests reached 634, of which 272 people received prison sentences of up to 10 years. During the period of martial law, the extent of overall repressions surged again – almost 10,000 people were interned, about 11,000 faced trials and the number of arrests and fines was many times bigger still. The last political prisoner of the PRL left prison in the end of December 1989.
The periodic mass upheaval also brought many casualties. In June 1956, 58 people were killed in Poznań 58; in December 1970, 45 were killed with a staggering 1165 wounded, and at least 56 people lost their lives following the declaration of martial law in 1981. The last count includes people who were killed during the pacification of several strikes and demonstrations, captured protesters murdered at police stations, and victims of assassinations. "
Yes yes, we've seen what the kültür träger did to humanity 80 years ago. Killing 30 millions Russians, 6 millions Poles, 1 million Serves without hating them, that deserve a Nobel Price of Peace for all the German people.
Last night (on a Friday of course), it was announced that the Tomahawks have been released for use "deep inside" Russia.
"Cry havoc! And let slip the Dogs of War." All we can hope is that Russia chews the Tomahawks up like it has with everything else the United States has thrown at them -- the Abrams, the Leopard 2s, the Bradley Fighting Vehicles, the ATACMs, the Patriots, the HIMARs, the Storm Shadows, all of it.
For those who still refuse to pay attention: Forget NATO. The United States is NATO. Ukraine can't tie its own shoelaces without US supplied GPS and satellite target imaging technology.
As Maya Angelou said: "When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time."
How many times is this now? The Department of Defense changed into "The Department of War."
The endless wars and warmongering.
I don't know about the rest of you, but these fool idiots are really going to do it.
i find dubious too maduro's recent request for modern weapons, after only few days ago they were boasting about the big numbers of them - thousands of aa and anti-ship missiles. unlike other countries, venezuela's socialism is not in danger, because the population adhered to it (except under occupation and direct repression), only the position of maduro, the american asset, is.
ok, when i know, i know; and when i don't know, i don't know, so i notify everybody, to avoid making them trouble. in this case, what you mention is the very well noticed, and also pretty obvious context - but why would someone who doesn't make genuine threats go such a length in an apparently secondary place, like restricting civil flights over puerto rico? thank you if you answer.
NATO magnifying issues relating to straying Russian fighter jets and drones? Total hypocrisy!!
USA and UK, in particular, have been overflying foreign sovereign territories for decades without criticism from Western sources. What individual NATO countries should be doing is critically considering their individual risk vs benefit of probable consequences for supporting provocations of Russia and Belorussia. NATO executives hide behind their desks as they put the future of the entire Euro region in jeopardy. Arguments about border issues that originated 80 years ago are irrelevant and must be left as history and a thing of the past.
" USA and UK, in particular, have been overflying foreign sovereign territories for decades without criticism from Western sources. "
Where's the constant condemnation of this from China, India or Russia ?
It's there. Maria Zakharova has spoken on these subjects. Not that the fully owned, fully controlled, fully manipulated, and fully propagandized US media will report on it.
The UN ? Vetoes ? Sanctions ?
Of course it's raging hypocrisy. So what,if it works?
Isn’t that the goal of every action NATO takes? And why can’t the Trump administration seem to understand? The globalist goal is to destroy Russia, that’s why they provoked this war.
Dangerous for Russia, yes.
But incredibly dangerous for Europeans too.
I don't think that France, with a 11% rate president without Congress majority can allow himself to share nuclear weapon with anyone.
Everybody knows that UK nuclear weapons are actually US weapons and if UK share them, that means that USA share them.
" Everybody knows that UK nuclear weapons are actually US weapons and if UK share them, that means that USA share them. "
This would be obvious if everyone stopped pretending that European countries have free agency .
No, no, it's not the same thing. Concerning the UK bomb, it's a treaty from 1942 between UK and USA which subordinate the UK employ of its own bomb to the acceptance of USA. It's notorious.
I'm sure it had a choice in the matter. SMH
Why, what would happen? Macron is not running for re-election and the Parliament fears the results of an early election.
That was an honest question, by the way.
Ok my friend, I answer.
The French Constitution forbid to share the french nuclear deterrence. So, the president can't share it by himself. He need a constitutionnel change.
For doing it, he must gather the whole Congress, that mean Assembly ( 600 representants) and the Senat.( 300 senator) in a solemn vote and grab the 2/3 of vote.
Therefore, can you imagine a 11% rating president with less than 35% of representants and 15% of senators succeed in such a thing that french people would consider as a crime.
Even use our nuclear weapon to protect another state is forbidden by the Constitution.
It can only be use for protect french territory or if state is about to collapse after an attack( nuclear or not).
Reason why I find stupid the AMC subtleties about Oreschnik saying that as it's not a nuclear weapon, a enemy stroke with it will not retaliate with nuke.
I can assure you that if Russia send an Oreschnik on Elysée or a nuclear power plant, France, with its small arms will do all it's possible to send some big nuclear shots on Russia.
Thanks, that's why I asked.
Poland now realizes the risks of confrontation with Russia. Polands biggest enemy was Germany. Russia fought back when they invaded Russian territory. Poles need to realize that their biggest enemy was Germany which hated all Slavic people.
" Poles need to realize that their biggest enemy was Germany which hated all Slavic people. "
You should read what Soviet backed, small hat, Communists did to the Polish people over the decades.
Ha yes? They, like Germans, killed 6 millions Poles? Did they treat them, like Germans did, as serfs?
Did they , like German did, killed systematically every intellectual worker?
When the awful communists and horrible Russians leaved in 1990, Poles were not well educated? Not in good sanitary situation? Starving? With no infrastructure? No own industry?
You're right, terrible communists and Russians in deed.
" In June 1944, units of the Home Army cooperated with the Red Army in the battles for Vilnius, Lviv, Lublin and other towns and cities. After this short period of cooperation, the Polish units were disarmed, officers arrested and those soldiers who refused to join the communist-controlled military were interned. Soviet repressions against the Polish underground continued throughout the following months. About 40,000 soldiers and Polish Underground State officials were deported deep into the Soviet Union. Thousands of others were repressed by the developing communist structures.
In 1945 about 40,000 - 50,000 people from Polish territories were deported to forced labour camps in the USSR, most of them from Upper Silesia. Until 1947, units of the NKVD were stationed in Poland and participated in battles against the anti-communist underground. The biggest operation of Soviet forces was the Augustów roundup in July 1945, during which over 7000 people were arrested and almost 700 killed.
The system of forced labour camps was established in 1945 and by 1950 there were 206 camps on Polish territory. The number of inmates is estimated at around 300,000. The last camps were closed in 1958. The number of political prison sentences between 1944 - 1956 is unknown, though at one point there were up to 50,000 political prisoners in the system. In the aforementioned time period, about 3,500 death sentences were imposed for political reasons, of which over 2,500 were carried out. On top of that, over 20,000 inmates died in prisons and labour camps. The overall number of victims of the 1944-1956 period is estimated at around 50,000.
About 100 different laws served as the foundation for these large-scale repressions. In addition to imprisonment and forced labour, administrative punishments such as fees and arrests were also widely used. Within just a few years, between 1952-1955, over half a million peasants were given such punishments because they did not give their compulsory shares in produce to the authorities.
As a result of the 1956 amnesty, most political inmates were released. In the following years, political trials were not as commonplace, only a few tens to a few hundreds were sentenced annually. The repressions usually only increased in response to demonstrations and protests. For example, after the protests in Nowa Huta (1960) almost 500 people were arrested, out of which 87 were sentenced to prison while 119 were fined. During the strikes and demonstrations in March 1968, over 2,500 people were arrested, and 540 criminal investigations were launched. In December 1970, over 3,000 people were arrested. In June 1976, the number of arrests reached 634, of which 272 people received prison sentences of up to 10 years. During the period of martial law, the extent of overall repressions surged again – almost 10,000 people were interned, about 11,000 faced trials and the number of arrests and fines was many times bigger still. The last political prisoner of the PRL left prison in the end of December 1989.
The periodic mass upheaval also brought many casualties. In June 1956, 58 people were killed in Poznań 58; in December 1970, 45 were killed with a staggering 1165 wounded, and at least 56 people lost their lives following the declaration of martial law in 1981. The last count includes people who were killed during the pacification of several strikes and demonstrations, captured protesters murdered at police stations, and victims of assassinations. "
The Riussians gave them a discepline which they do not have.
This is why the term "dumb Polack" is so often used .
" And culture, which you cannot match. Never! "
That culture will be gone in a few decades. You're attacking the wrong people my German friend.
But you are right, Germans don't hate. They only despise .
And that's enough for them to kill tens of millions men, women, children without hate.
Yes yes, we've seen what the kültür träger did to humanity 80 years ago. Killing 30 millions Russians, 6 millions Poles, 1 million Serves without hating them, that deserve a Nobel Price of Peace for all the German people.
The Soviets attacked first, and were more brutal then the Germans ever were.
I hope you succeed, but explain how ?
Just wanted to pass along some information.
Last night (on a Friday of course), it was announced that the Tomahawks have been released for use "deep inside" Russia.
"Cry havoc! And let slip the Dogs of War." All we can hope is that Russia chews the Tomahawks up like it has with everything else the United States has thrown at them -- the Abrams, the Leopard 2s, the Bradley Fighting Vehicles, the ATACMs, the Patriots, the HIMARs, the Storm Shadows, all of it.
For those who still refuse to pay attention: Forget NATO. The United States is NATO. Ukraine can't tie its own shoelaces without US supplied GPS and satellite target imaging technology.
As Maya Angelou said: "When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time."
How many times is this now? The Department of Defense changed into "The Department of War."
The endless wars and warmongering.
I don't know about the rest of you, but these fool idiots are really going to do it.
i find dubious too maduro's recent request for modern weapons, after only few days ago they were boasting about the big numbers of them - thousands of aa and anti-ship missiles. unlike other countries, venezuela's socialism is not in danger, because the population adhered to it (except under occupation and direct repression), only the position of maduro, the american asset, is.
civilian aviation too, what's the meaning of this?
ok, when i know, i know; and when i don't know, i don't know, so i notify everybody, to avoid making them trouble. in this case, what you mention is the very well noticed, and also pretty obvious context - but why would someone who doesn't make genuine threats go such a length in an apparently secondary place, like restricting civil flights over puerto rico? thank you if you answer.