Yes, it was, because it simply cites social media speculation. Nobody serious, meaning foreign officials and respected academics, lent any credence to that.
You read what you wanted to believe, therefore you believed it, and now you're convinced that Iran secretly has a nuclear weapon.
If that was really true though, then why isn't the U…
Yes, it was, because it simply cites social media speculation. Nobody serious, meaning foreign officials and respected academics, lent any credence to that.
You read what you wanted to believe, therefore you believed it, and now you're convinced that Iran secretly has a nuclear weapon.
If that was really true though, then why isn't the US scared of an uncontrollable escalation sequence with Iran like it's scared of one with Russia?
Why would US officials tell Politico that those two's different nuclear statuses is responsible for why it'll shoot down one's missiles but not the other's?
How do you cogently account for these double standards if both are supposedly nuclear-armed powers that can destroy the US?
Yes, it was, because it simply cites social media speculation. Nobody serious, meaning foreign officials and respected academics, lent any credence to that.
You read what you wanted to believe, therefore you believed it, and now you're convinced that Iran secretly has a nuclear weapon.
If that was really true though, then why isn't the US scared of an uncontrollable escalation sequence with Iran like it's scared of one with Russia?
Why would US officials tell Politico that those two's different nuclear statuses is responsible for why it'll shoot down one's missiles but not the other's?
How do you cogently account for these double standards if both are supposedly nuclear-armed powers that can destroy the US?
I don't necessarily believe it