The perceptible shift in Russian media coverage since last fall was likely a response to Trump reneging on the “Spirit of Anchorage” and implementing the “Neo-Reagan Doctrine”.
The article ignores Laura Loomer’s strong Israel support. There seems to be an effort to tie the Ukraine and Iran conflicts together. Loomer is a polarizing figure among Trump voters. My gut feeling is similar to several other so called conservatives, her popularity is manufactured.
I genuinely don't believe that had anything to do with it. After all, one could argue that the reason why she initially believed that Ukraine was rehabilitating Nazism is because she's Jewish. Regardless of her popularity or lack thereof, Trump still looks to her for guidance, and that's why her change of heart could be very consequential.
I respect your viewpoint, and I agree she has huge influence with Trump, I’m a lot more cynical on the 8th front and the use of influencers and fake popularity.
Loomers success pushing of purity testing of Trump Admin people on Israel support astonished me. There has been a purging of America first types, who are not seen as pro Israel enough. This administration is the most pro Israel Administration since Johnson.
Tucker I would differentiate from Candace Owen’s. Tucker is definitely under attack by Israel and its supporters. Owens I put in the same category as Loomer, doing stuff for clicks that make no sense. Perhaps this Ukraine trip was a way to get clicks, Loomer sure got a lot of notice. The Azof interview and advice was bizarre.
I think having high-level female advisers—who tend to be more emotionally prone to certain types of manipulation—is itself a mistake on Trump's part, paradoxically so given MAGA's valid critiques of feminism (the sexes are biologically distinct, after all).
I think that he should differentiate relying on her for detailed, proven info about who within his admin might be disloyal and relying on her for policy guidance; the first is clearly beneficial, the second is extremely risky with no clear benefits given her lack of policy expertise and understanding of global processes.
I have seen very cool ladies who could handle domestic political concerns, if not international geopolitical issues, in a different time and place. Such female advisers may exist, but Laura Loomer is not one of them.
Trump has learned he can get equivalent experience cheaper hiring females. It may also be the fact females are usually less confrontational than males.
If anything, I think his willingness to do so exposes him as a potentially fragile person who prefers flattery and emotional satisfaction rather than honest assessment.
As far as Israel goes, I think Loomer, like Trump, is partly reacting to the fact that some of the MAGA "dissidents", along with state-adjacent "non-Russian pro-Russians" (NRPRs) hosted by Russian media, are not only critical of Israel, but also close to Iranian (semi-)official organs like PressTV, which also peddle leftist–Islamist takes on issues such as migration, "woke" ID politics, and of course Trump's agenda.
Obviously to back Israel in response is just as illogical as reversing oneself on the equally vital Ukraine question, but there are plenty of reasons for Americans, not least MAGA, to be just as critical of Iranian as Israeli—or any other foreign—meddling. Post-1979 Iran pursues an anti-American ideological project independent of its anti-Zionism.
My problem is less with criticism of Iran than with the fact that American elites often think Iran is solely or mainly Israel's concern. Both pro- and anti-Israel U.S. factions share the same Israel-centric (or even Jew-centric) view, as though American interests in countering Iran are not valuable in and of themselves—unless Israeli or Jewish lives are at stake, Iran's many attacks on Americans notwithstanding.
A large part of American policy in the Middle East and Ukraine are neocon driven. Neocons such as Victoria Nuland, Paul Wolferitz are Jewish. And the strange fact Israel had a list of. 7 Countries to take out, and Iran was the last one on it.
And per Thomas Massie each member of Congress has an aipac handler. And aipac has a very good record of taking out via primaries anti Israel congressman. $231 million in campaign contributions:
I do not think that AIPAC has as much clout as it did a few decades ago; even then its base was contracting. Now most Democrats and a handful of Republicans oppose Israeli policy—be it on Iran, Palestine, or the MENA as a whole. (Support for Ukraine, by contrast, remains more or less bipartisan, MAGA skeptics notwithstanding.)
Just look at the votes: Trump is forced to rely on a select few Democrats to get his Iran funding approved. Most of the Ds have conspired to block the Iran war as much as they opposed Trump's assault on Iran ally Venezuela. The crux of their argument is that Trump should be focusing on Ukraine rather than leftist–Islamist subversion (as Trump sees it).
I’ve been surprised that aipac and friends have not managed to destroy Tucker Carlson. I agree Israel has lost huge popularity among U.S. voters, the 8th front, but they are still extremely powerful in Congress. That vote on sharing U.S. military technology shows that. Thomas Massies loss was a warning to those not toeing the pro Israeli line.
I would disagree with you on this one - Loomer's positions always and only have to do with what's best for Israel, and secondly what's best for Jews in the U.S.. To think that her evolving views have anything to do with big-picture political balancing acts is to give her and her cadre way too much credit.
I think the idea Daniel Gladstein starts to develop below is partly correct - this is a reaction to Tucker Carlson and a few other alt media types becoming increasingly hostile to the Iran war, in a "friend of my enemy" sort of way. Jewish positions in the U.S. are much more visceral and much less reasoned. You can listen to any neocon or read their work to see it.
More than that, Trump's base is realigning. With only two parties, neither "tent" is a completely comfortable mix of interests. But Trump's has severe contradictions between its various constituent groups - Zionist evangelicals who have weird eschatological beliefs about the pending end of the world; small business owners and the traditional Republican base; and a whole lot of "Don't Tread on Me" types with nowhere else to go.
I think Trump's decided he's done with the MAGA types in his party. The big clue for me was when he stopped wearing red baseball hats a few months ago - and switched to white caps (he always wears one of some sort while golfing at Mar-a-Lago). It's becoming increasingly obvious that Trump is going to be impeached next year, and probably convicted; his corruption grows more and more extravagant and "in your face", he can't pass election integrity that would tilt the balance in his favor (by removing long-running Democrat strategies at cheating, while leaving the same in place for Republicans like limiting access to places to vote), and the cost of gasoline is going to be unacceptable for voters going into the election.
So Trump and his coterie have decided to cut ties with the MAGA types now, while there's time to discredit and attack them, rather than wait until the impeachment trial when it's too late. Part of that is cutting ties with their issues - foremost among them Ukraine. But it's there across the board. Trump's supporting more H1B and other types of visas now - in a year that created 150k jobs total and had 500k young people finish university and begin looking for jobs. There are many other examples of the realignment (or "coming out of the closet", which is what it resembles to me).
I would replace “maga types” with “America First types” that have mostly been purged from Trumps administration per Robert Barnes. The major issue being America first types do not see Israel as a priority. And the hubris of Israel action in U.S. politics has resulted in a backlash.
Israel is very unpopular in the Democratic Party, and among younger gop. The anti Semitism accusations and weaponization don’t seem to be working as well. Conflation of anti Zionist, anti Israel, and anti semitism is losing power. And the attacks on free speach, especially college campuses, are getting libertarians in arms.
Nope. A big part of Christian Evangelicals are Christian Zionist, so have been supporting establishing a Jewish homeland since the 17th century. Long before the advent of modern Israel. You can read up on Mark Twayn or Herbert Melville.
It's different in Continental Europe since Calvinism was only established in Switzerland and Holland. Other pro-Zionist sects in Europe are demographically rare. Catholics, Orthodox and Lutherans are supercessionist, so obviously anti-Zionist.
She most definitely advises him and credible reports indicate that she got him fire six National Security Council staffers last year. They’re also extremely close friends and Trump considers her to be among his most loyal allies.
Trump has been deeply hurt by so many betrayals and lies during his first administration. And then the attempted destruction of him and his family during the Biden Administration. The difference in his official portrait is telling.
Trump seems to have a weakness for brown nosers, and does not take criticism well. My gut feeling is Netanyahu stroked Trumps ego and narcissistic tendencies to get him into this Iran snafu.
I am having trouble taking this woman seriously. Checked her interviews with Zelensky and Biletsky and her Facebook page. She's such a cartoonish character. Very shallow arguments. No depth to anything she says. She hates Muslims (ALL Muslims) and is not afraid to say it. Surprised she hasn't been charged with hate speech (or maybe not). Or maybe not. Not impressed in the slightest by this woman, quite the opposite. I say good riddance to her changing camp.
Trump's bosses changed his stance on Russia and Loomer automatically followed. She might also have been shadow banned on Twitter, wth her shift being rewarded with the return of her monetized upvotes...
This is what I have learned well in endless history and political science courses at the graduate level: You mercilessly disregard the avalanche of BS that politicians eject while they speak. Line up their actions, place them in context and analyze them. Trump is a verified, transparent quantity at this point. From ‘I will finish the Ukraine war in a single day.’ He went to everlasting escalations and new wars. A step by step analysis of his acts connected to the Ukraine, Palestinian and Iran conflicts present a seasoned homicidal maniac who is already risking nuclear war and working toward the dissolution of the American Empire while placing pressure to raise fossil fuel prices. He is a worthy partner of Zelensky and shall be judged as such.
I don't follow Laura Loomer, and only know her through the reports of others (who mostly disagree with her), but I get the feeling that her motivation is money and power. Likely she takes the position that generates the most clicks and cash. Others have sewn up the Russia agnostic market, so pivoting to Ukraine now is entering an underserved market segment, allowing her to be the primary voice - hoovering up the attention and funding for that position. Plus, as she says, she is a Pentagon journalist - so she is also the official outlet/spokesperson for the Hegseth faction. Money and influence - the Grift must flow.
I used to think that high places were dominated by dead-serious people, well-versed in history, with sharp analytical minds. Once I got a peek into that world, I found that assumption was not always true. Or better described as "rarely true". And it seems most national and local governments are on the down slope, sliding most of the time, rather than clawing up. I guess this is why Chinese political philosophers had almost unanimously argued for the importance of people, rather than the importance of the system or scheme. In the situation cited in this post, I would argue that the chief in charge of communication or propaganda needs some sharpening. My advice: don't make the mistakes made by the Americans.
If we are looking for causation, we need look no further than the Loomer sexbot receiving updated orders from Tel Aviv, in relation to its target Donald J Trump.
Neither. Loomer sensed that the Trump administration was shifted so she shifted. Standard cultists behavior. There's nothing deep about and principles had nothing to do with it.
Media can and does at times see wrong. RUSSIA, the worlds nuclear super power. This is what we have to talk about. All the lowere "ifs " & "ands" are of little consequence.
Because she's one of his top advisors! They meet regularly, talk frequently, and he looks to her for guidance due to perceiving her to be among his most loyal allies after she obtained proof of certain high-level officials being Democrat sympathizers who he feared were plotting to undermine him just like during his first term.
I wonder if someone who was a smart, well-reasoned ruler could avoid the trap of people in their state apparatus "who [they] feared were plotting to undermine [them]"? If so, how would they do it? OT to the topic of the article I think, but how do you cut off the opportunity for someone to curry favor with you (if you're an enlightened, self-aware ruler) by "exposing your enemies" (whether true or not)?
She knows Trump, that's what I've been saying! It's been widely reported over the past 18 months at minimum, even longer, I think. He perceives her as one of his most loyal allies and that's why they became close personal friends.
Are you saying that USA are leaded by a moron advised by an imbecile?
There is 330 millions Yankees, hundreds thousand of brilliant academics and officials and and this stupid , versatile, sionist, racist cow is the main voice in the ear of the POTUS?
Kissinger, Baker, Bundy, Brezinsky, Scowcroft, and now ....Loomer???
Why not Kardashian or Steven Seagal . What a forfeiture
There is no legally-admissible proof that Trump is a pedophile. The unnamed Epstein "witnesses" who refused to testify under oath do not count. The fact that one dislikes Trump's Israel–Iran policy does not make him guilty of an unrelated, unprovable crime.
Trump's reported behavior with teen contestants at beauty pageants he owned or controlled was creepy, as were his comments about his daughter when she was teenage. Still, not pedophilia. If it was that we'd have seen Trump playing Santa Claus with small kids on his knee instead of just a walk-through in the lobby of his hotel for Home Alone.
" The financial filings, infrastructure plans, and military data prove that Western and Gulf powers had already mapped out their ideal economic futures. When Iran escalated the conflict in March 2026, these actors possessed the precise financial and legal scaffolding required to instantly turn the destruction into a lucrative restructuring exercise. The article successfully proves that the economic outcomes of the war were highly unequal and heavily premeditated"
The article ignores Laura Loomer’s strong Israel support. There seems to be an effort to tie the Ukraine and Iran conflicts together. Loomer is a polarizing figure among Trump voters. My gut feeling is similar to several other so called conservatives, her popularity is manufactured.
I genuinely don't believe that had anything to do with it. After all, one could argue that the reason why she initially believed that Ukraine was rehabilitating Nazism is because she's Jewish. Regardless of her popularity or lack thereof, Trump still looks to her for guidance, and that's why her change of heart could be very consequential.
I respect your viewpoint, and I agree she has huge influence with Trump, I’m a lot more cynical on the 8th front and the use of influencers and fake popularity.
Loomers success pushing of purity testing of Trump Admin people on Israel support astonished me. There has been a purging of America first types, who are not seen as pro Israel enough. This administration is the most pro Israel Administration since Johnson.
Tucker I would differentiate from Candace Owen’s. Tucker is definitely under attack by Israel and its supporters. Owens I put in the same category as Loomer, doing stuff for clicks that make no sense. Perhaps this Ukraine trip was a way to get clicks, Loomer sure got a lot of notice. The Azof interview and advice was bizarre.
Okay, but the crucial difference is that neither Tucker nor Candace have any influence over Trump anymore, that's the point.
She has the President's ear and he's the final decisionmaker on major matters concerning Ukraine such as more escalations.
Her changing her views on this conflict is therefore incomparably more consequential than if any other influencer did.
I think having high-level female advisers—who tend to be more emotionally prone to certain types of manipulation—is itself a mistake on Trump's part, paradoxically so given MAGA's valid critiques of feminism (the sexes are biologically distinct, after all).
I think that he should differentiate relying on her for detailed, proven info about who within his admin might be disloyal and relying on her for policy guidance; the first is clearly beneficial, the second is extremely risky with no clear benefits given her lack of policy expertise and understanding of global processes.
I have seen very cool ladies who could handle domestic political concerns, if not international geopolitical issues, in a different time and place. Such female advisers may exist, but Laura Loomer is not one of them.
Trump has learned he can get equivalent experience cheaper hiring females. It may also be the fact females are usually less confrontational than males.
If anything, I think his willingness to do so exposes him as a potentially fragile person who prefers flattery and emotional satisfaction rather than honest assessment.
As far as Israel goes, I think Loomer, like Trump, is partly reacting to the fact that some of the MAGA "dissidents", along with state-adjacent "non-Russian pro-Russians" (NRPRs) hosted by Russian media, are not only critical of Israel, but also close to Iranian (semi-)official organs like PressTV, which also peddle leftist–Islamist takes on issues such as migration, "woke" ID politics, and of course Trump's agenda.
Obviously to back Israel in response is just as illogical as reversing oneself on the equally vital Ukraine question, but there are plenty of reasons for Americans, not least MAGA, to be just as critical of Iranian as Israeli—or any other foreign—meddling. Post-1979 Iran pursues an anti-American ideological project independent of its anti-Zionism.
My problem is less with criticism of Iran than with the fact that American elites often think Iran is solely or mainly Israel's concern. Both pro- and anti-Israel U.S. factions share the same Israel-centric (or even Jew-centric) view, as though American interests in countering Iran are not valuable in and of themselves—unless Israeli or Jewish lives are at stake, Iran's many attacks on Americans notwithstanding.
A large part of American policy in the Middle East and Ukraine are neocon driven. Neocons such as Victoria Nuland, Paul Wolferitz are Jewish. And the strange fact Israel had a list of. 7 Countries to take out, and Iran was the last one on it.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/we-re-going-to-take-out-7-countries-in-5-years-Iraq-Syria-lebanon-Libya-somalia-Sudan-Iran/5166
And per Thomas Massie each member of Congress has an aipac handler. And aipac has a very good record of taking out via primaries anti Israel congressman. $231 million in campaign contributions:
https://gen-us.space/data/aipac-spending
https://www.trackaipac.com/congress
I do not think that AIPAC has as much clout as it did a few decades ago; even then its base was contracting. Now most Democrats and a handful of Republicans oppose Israeli policy—be it on Iran, Palestine, or the MENA as a whole. (Support for Ukraine, by contrast, remains more or less bipartisan, MAGA skeptics notwithstanding.)
Just look at the votes: Trump is forced to rely on a select few Democrats to get his Iran funding approved. Most of the Ds have conspired to block the Iran war as much as they opposed Trump's assault on Iran ally Venezuela. The crux of their argument is that Trump should be focusing on Ukraine rather than leftist–Islamist subversion (as Trump sees it).
I’ve been surprised that aipac and friends have not managed to destroy Tucker Carlson. I agree Israel has lost huge popularity among U.S. voters, the 8th front, but they are still extremely powerful in Congress. That vote on sharing U.S. military technology shows that. Thomas Massies loss was a warning to those not toeing the pro Israeli line.
I would disagree with you on this one - Loomer's positions always and only have to do with what's best for Israel, and secondly what's best for Jews in the U.S.. To think that her evolving views have anything to do with big-picture political balancing acts is to give her and her cadre way too much credit.
I think the idea Daniel Gladstein starts to develop below is partly correct - this is a reaction to Tucker Carlson and a few other alt media types becoming increasingly hostile to the Iran war, in a "friend of my enemy" sort of way. Jewish positions in the U.S. are much more visceral and much less reasoned. You can listen to any neocon or read their work to see it.
More than that, Trump's base is realigning. With only two parties, neither "tent" is a completely comfortable mix of interests. But Trump's has severe contradictions between its various constituent groups - Zionist evangelicals who have weird eschatological beliefs about the pending end of the world; small business owners and the traditional Republican base; and a whole lot of "Don't Tread on Me" types with nowhere else to go.
I think Trump's decided he's done with the MAGA types in his party. The big clue for me was when he stopped wearing red baseball hats a few months ago - and switched to white caps (he always wears one of some sort while golfing at Mar-a-Lago). It's becoming increasingly obvious that Trump is going to be impeached next year, and probably convicted; his corruption grows more and more extravagant and "in your face", he can't pass election integrity that would tilt the balance in his favor (by removing long-running Democrat strategies at cheating, while leaving the same in place for Republicans like limiting access to places to vote), and the cost of gasoline is going to be unacceptable for voters going into the election.
So Trump and his coterie have decided to cut ties with the MAGA types now, while there's time to discredit and attack them, rather than wait until the impeachment trial when it's too late. Part of that is cutting ties with their issues - foremost among them Ukraine. But it's there across the board. Trump's supporting more H1B and other types of visas now - in a year that created 150k jobs total and had 500k young people finish university and begin looking for jobs. There are many other examples of the realignment (or "coming out of the closet", which is what it resembles to me).
I would replace “maga types” with “America First types” that have mostly been purged from Trumps administration per Robert Barnes. The major issue being America first types do not see Israel as a priority. And the hubris of Israel action in U.S. politics has resulted in a backlash.
Israel is very unpopular in the Democratic Party, and among younger gop. The anti Semitism accusations and weaponization don’t seem to be working as well. Conflation of anti Zionist, anti Israel, and anti semitism is losing power. And the attacks on free speach, especially college campuses, are getting libertarians in arms.
Israel has done an amazing influence operation targeting Christian evangelicals in the U.S.
Nope. A big part of Christian Evangelicals are Christian Zionist, so have been supporting establishing a Jewish homeland since the 17th century. Long before the advent of modern Israel. You can read up on Mark Twayn or Herbert Melville.
It's different in Continental Europe since Calvinism was only established in Switzerland and Holland. Other pro-Zionist sects in Europe are demographically rare. Catholics, Orthodox and Lutherans are supercessionist, so obviously anti-Zionist.
This Israel loving pro-Ukraine woman did not shape Trump policies, guaranteed. She has followed orders. We are looking at the usual political theatre.
She most definitely advises him and credible reports indicate that she got him fire six National Security Council staffers last year. They’re also extremely close friends and Trump considers her to be among his most loyal allies.
Trump has been deeply hurt by so many betrayals and lies during his first administration. And then the attempted destruction of him and his family during the Biden Administration. The difference in his official portrait is telling.
Trump seems to have a weakness for brown nosers, and does not take criticism well. My gut feeling is Netanyahu stroked Trumps ego and narcissistic tendencies to get him into this Iran snafu.
I am having trouble taking this woman seriously. Checked her interviews with Zelensky and Biletsky and her Facebook page. She's such a cartoonish character. Very shallow arguments. No depth to anything she says. She hates Muslims (ALL Muslims) and is not afraid to say it. Surprised she hasn't been charged with hate speech (or maybe not). Or maybe not. Not impressed in the slightest by this woman, quite the opposite. I say good riddance to her changing camp.
Quite a loony. She tweeted to say Trump should bomb the Funeral Ceremonies of the lae Ayatollah. She brags about being Trump's love interest.
Most weird thing about this is just how many people did not know what a weirdo she is famous for being
" I am having trouble taking this woman seriously. "
"She" is a "he". Look it up.
Trump's bosses changed his stance on Russia and Loomer automatically followed. She might also have been shadow banned on Twitter, wth her shift being rewarded with the return of her monetized upvotes...
Is that thing a "woman". Looks like a victim of a botched "gender affirmation" surgery. Ideal mate for Trump.
This is what I have learned well in endless history and political science courses at the graduate level: You mercilessly disregard the avalanche of BS that politicians eject while they speak. Line up their actions, place them in context and analyze them. Trump is a verified, transparent quantity at this point. From ‘I will finish the Ukraine war in a single day.’ He went to everlasting escalations and new wars. A step by step analysis of his acts connected to the Ukraine, Palestinian and Iran conflicts present a seasoned homicidal maniac who is already risking nuclear war and working toward the dissolution of the American Empire while placing pressure to raise fossil fuel prices. He is a worthy partner of Zelensky and shall be judged as such.
I don't follow Laura Loomer, and only know her through the reports of others (who mostly disagree with her), but I get the feeling that her motivation is money and power. Likely she takes the position that generates the most clicks and cash. Others have sewn up the Russia agnostic market, so pivoting to Ukraine now is entering an underserved market segment, allowing her to be the primary voice - hoovering up the attention and funding for that position. Plus, as she says, she is a Pentagon journalist - so she is also the official outlet/spokesperson for the Hegseth faction. Money and influence - the Grift must flow.
I used to think that high places were dominated by dead-serious people, well-versed in history, with sharp analytical minds. Once I got a peek into that world, I found that assumption was not always true. Or better described as "rarely true". And it seems most national and local governments are on the down slope, sliding most of the time, rather than clawing up. I guess this is why Chinese political philosophers had almost unanimously argued for the importance of people, rather than the importance of the system or scheme. In the situation cited in this post, I would argue that the chief in charge of communication or propaganda needs some sharpening. My advice: don't make the mistakes made by the Americans.
Well, you’ve finally done it. You’ve made a post on a subject about which I have absolutely zero interest.
If we are looking for causation, we need look no further than the Loomer sexbot receiving updated orders from Tel Aviv, in relation to its target Donald J Trump.
Nonetheless it’s a disturbing development.
American here, we are convinced that every single one of her followers is a bot.
Ignore Laura Loomer. She is a transitory phenomenon and will not be remembered by history.
Neither. Loomer sensed that the Trump administration was shifted so she shifted. Standard cultists behavior. There's nothing deep about and principles had nothing to do with it.
Her influence on Trump is mostly exerted beneath his desk in the Oval Office.
Media can and does at times see wrong. RUSSIA, the worlds nuclear super power. This is what we have to talk about. All the lowere "ifs " & "ands" are of little consequence.
Top Trump Advisor?
Yes, and a very, very close one at that.
I could never figure out why she was flying on the Doomsday Plane?
Because she's one of his top advisors! They meet regularly, talk frequently, and he looks to her for guidance due to perceiving her to be among his most loyal allies after she obtained proof of certain high-level officials being Democrat sympathizers who he feared were plotting to undermine him just like during his first term.
I wonder if someone who was a smart, well-reasoned ruler could avoid the trap of people in their state apparatus "who [they] feared were plotting to undermine [them]"? If so, how would they do it? OT to the topic of the article I think, but how do you cut off the opportunity for someone to curry favor with you (if you're an enlightened, self-aware ruler) by "exposing your enemies" (whether true or not)?
She must know people in high places.
She knows Trump, that's what I've been saying! It's been widely reported over the past 18 months at minimum, even longer, I think. He perceives her as one of his most loyal allies and that's why they became close personal friends.
Are you saying that USA are leaded by a moron advised by an imbecile?
There is 330 millions Yankees, hundreds thousand of brilliant academics and officials and and this stupid , versatile, sionist, racist cow is the main voice in the ear of the POTUS?
Kissinger, Baker, Bundy, Brezinsky, Scowcroft, and now ....Loomer???
Why not Kardashian or Steven Seagal . What a forfeiture
She was flying on the Doomsday Plane because she is the Doomsday jew girl.
Really!
We might very well see World War III due to influencers like her, so her being aboard a nuclear aircraft is grimly ironic.
Let’s get real here: Trump is a verified pedophile and a homicidal maniac. He takes the jew girl as an ‘adviser’. It is a game as simple.
There is no legally-admissible proof that Trump is a pedophile. The unnamed Epstein "witnesses" who refused to testify under oath do not count. The fact that one dislikes Trump's Israel–Iran policy does not make him guilty of an unrelated, unprovable crime.
Trump's reported behavior with teen contestants at beauty pageants he owned or controlled was creepy, as were his comments about his daughter when she was teenage. Still, not pedophilia. If it was that we'd have seen Trump playing Santa Claus with small kids on his knee instead of just a walk-through in the lobby of his hotel for Home Alone.
" It is a game as simple."
Yes it is.
" The financial filings, infrastructure plans, and military data prove that Western and Gulf powers had already mapped out their ideal economic futures. When Iran escalated the conflict in March 2026, these actors possessed the precise financial and legal scaffolding required to instantly turn the destruction into a lucrative restructuring exercise. The article successfully proves that the economic outcomes of the war were highly unequal and heavily premeditated"
https://morganc000.substack.com/p/strait-theatre