Indefinitely perpetuating the Ukrainian Conflict through these means indefinitely delays the full implementation of the US’ planned “Pivot (back) to (East) Asia”, can lead to Russia selling its natural resource wealth to China at bargain-basement prices, and maintains China’s “active neutrality”.
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) referenced the EU’s summertime disbursement of the first €1 billion to Ukraine for drone procurement out of the €6 billion promised for this program in an article late last month about how “Ukraine’s Drone War Exposes An Uncomfortable Reliance On China”. They drew attention to the carve-out allowing Ukraine to purchase Chinese parts with these funds, ergo the politically incorrect observation back then that “The EU Plans To Pay China To Help Ukraine Kill Russians”.
RFE/RL reported that “While Kyiv has cut back on the purchase of ready-made drones from China, components such as motors, lithium batteries, and fiberoptics are still in high demand.” Additionally, “In the first six months of 2026, imports of Chinese parts had already reached around 76 percent of the total recorded for the previous year.” They also cited a Ukrainian report which claimed that “38 percent of the value of drone components imported by Ukraine in the first half of 2025 came from China.”
The purpose of their piece appears to be to instill a sense of urgency in Ukraine and the West alike to radically ramp up domestic drone production in order to reduce what one of their cited experts described as Ukraine’s “hostile interdependence” on China. They explained that “Beijing remains Kyiv’s largest trading partner, while Ukraine is a key supplier of agricultural goods to China.” That’s true, and it’s one of the reasons why China won’t cut Ukraine off from drone-related sales, but there’s more to it.
While Sino-Russo ties are better than at anytime in history, it was suspected as far back as early 2023 that “China Doesn’t Want Anyone To Win In Ukraine”, the reason being that a supposedly manageable forever war would indefinitely delay the full implementation of the US’ planned “Pivot (back) to (East) Asia”. Moreover, resource-rich Russia could become disproportionately dependent on China, thus leading to Moscow selling its natural wealth to Beijing at bargain-basement prices.
In pursuit of this cynical end, China has simultaneously played an irreplaceable role in providing Ukraine with drones, parts, and fiber optics (even if only indirectly through intermediaries like apologists have speculated) while serving as an irreplaceable valve from sanctions pressure for Russia. Ukraine is therefore able to keep pace with Russia’s military-technical advancements, the Russian economy avoids the crisis that the West sought to catalyze through sanctions, and China maintains its “active neutrality”.
The last point refers to China actively helping Ukraine and Russia, thus making it neutral in the sense of not taking either side. China financially profits from Ukraine’s drone-related purchases, its economy continues growing due to the large-scale import of heavily discounted Russian energy, and it relatively reduces the overall Western pressure upon it by proving that it’s not secretly “allied” with Russia. This policy, for whatever one might think about its merits, indisputably contributed to prolonging the conflict.
Had China cut Ukraine off from its drone-related sales in the spirit of its “no-limits” partnership with Russia that was declared several weeks before the start of special operation, then Russia might have attained more of its stated objectives in the conflict by now, if not outright achieved maximum victory. The US’ military and intelligence support for Ukraine is more important than China’s drone-related sales, but since there’s no end to US support in sight, Russia should try to get China to finally cut Ukraine off.
Putting Ukrainian ports on the Black Sea and the Danube out of action should help to reduce China’s dependence on Ukrainian agricultural imports, and to limit the importation of drone components from third parties via Türkiye etc.
I had thought initially that these attacks were designed to cause only limited damage to port infrastructure and the intention was to use the ‘blockade’ as a bargaining chip to extract concessions in eventual negotiations. I see now however that the Russians are using heavy FAB bombs as well as missiles in these airstrikes, so I’m assuming that they now intend to cause such significant damage as to make the ports unusable on a long-term basis, and so present the West with a fait accompli.
Further interdicting Ukrainian trade through severing its rail connections with Europe and knocking out bridges and other choke points is likely causing great concern to Ukraine’s Western allies.
I don’t really understand why this wasn’t done a couple of years ago.
We can say exactly the same about Russia and war against Iran. It doesn't help USA nor Israel but it enjoy a long war in Iran.
With such behaviour, BRICS will go nowhere