Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paulo Aguiar's avatar

When one side opens the door to external involvement, it shouldn’t feign outrage when the other walks through it. Ukraine leveraged NATO support to push into Russian territory; so it’s only natural that Russia would call in a reliable partner to stabilize its own borders. That’s not escalation. It’s equilibrium. Moscow’s message is clear: if the West insists on blurring red lines, others will start redrawing the map.

Expand full comment
barnabus's avatar

I would argue that the West already had enough signal intelligence evidence for NK - so Russia's admission of NK involvement was more about having more of the cards lying on the table openly. It improves the negotiation posture. Because the other side is then less likely to assume Russia's lacking manpower. Moreover, there is an implicit threat Russia could start training Iranian Revolutionary Guards at battlefield conditions too.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts