Chad is being targeted because it refuses to do the US’ bidding by expelling the Russian Ambassador, which was intended to provoke a security dilemma between those two that could then lead to this regional military powerhouse functioning as the vanguard of American efforts against Wagner. N’Djamena impressively refused and instead expelled the German Ambassador, who was preparing a Color Revolution, hence why Washington now wants to punish it on superficially democratic pretexts.
Bloomberg opinion columnist Bobby Ghosh is once again agitating for American meddling in Africa after calling for sanctions just last week against those countries that choose to partner with Wagner, which Politico recently revealed is the target of the US’ latest Hybrid War in Africa. This liberal-globalist is now demanding that “Biden Shouldn’t Let Chad Become Another Sudan”, which he claims can be averted by the US “insist[ing] on an accelerated transfer of power to civilians.”
Ghosh still wants America to go through with his latest meddling plan despite acknowledging that the German Ambassador was expelled early last month precisely because he criticized the country’s ongoing transition, which the authorities interpreted as hinting at forthcoming Color Revolution plans. That wasn’t what the US expected when it reportedly informed Chad that Russia was plotting a coup against it via Wagner, which shows that N’Djamena doesn’t blindly trust Washington.
This regional military powerhouse is nowadays suspicious of the West as evidenced by its expulsion of the German envoy instead of the Russian one in defiance of America’s implied demand. Its threat assessment of the US will only further spike after Ghosh’s latest lobbying effort for Biden to meddle in its affairs. This comes shortly after the New York Times and Washington Post both admitted that American meddling was responsible for the Sudanese Crisis, which on the surface discredits his pretext.
Upon reading their articles, which are cited in the preceding hyperlinked analysis on that curious turn of narrative events, it becomes clear that this was just a limited hangout for the purpose of encouraging even more meddling there on the basis of making amends for its prior mistakes. A similar agenda is at play in Ghosh’s article, who’s exploiting the attention given to that neighboring country’s crisis and his Mainstream Media (MSM) peers’ misleading admissions of its origin to push for meddling in Chad too.
Being the diehard liberal-globalist ideologue that he is, this Bloomberg opinion columnist can’t accept the principle of state sovereignty, instead believing that the US has a so-called ‘moral right to interfere in all other countries’ affairs in pursuit of what he’s convinced is the ‘greater good’. Be that as it may, there’s no doubt that he’d be apoplectic if anyone alleged that any other country was interfering in a Western one’s affairs in pursuit of whatever they might also believe is the ‘greater good’.
Rhetoric aside, it’s very concerning that a MSM outlet as influential as Bloomberg is preconditioning the public to accept more American meddling in Africa via Ghosh’s latest article series. This suggests that the US intends to turn the entire continent into a New Cold War battleground on the dual pretexts of containing Wagner and promoting democracy, both narratives of which are aggressively being pushed by this opinion columnist.
Chad is being targeted because it refuses to do the US’ bidding by expelling the Russian Ambassador, which was intended to provoke a security dilemma between those two that could then lead to this regional military powerhouse functioning as the vanguard of American efforts against Wagner. N’Djamena impressively refused and instead expelled the German Ambassador, who was preparing a Color Revolution, hence why Washington now wants to punish it on superficially democratic pretexts.
The security situation in that country will thus likely become much more complicated in the coming future since it should now be taken for granted that the West is at the very least seriously flirting with such a regime change scenario as revenge for Chad’s proud defense of its objective national interests. If the US can’t successfully divide-and-rule Chad and Russia, then its backup plan is to destabilize that Central African state in the hopes of replacing its pragmatic leader with a warmongering puppet.
Love your writing, really is great stuff, but sometimes it's hard to beat a glimpse from the side. 'A picture's worth a thousand words,' too true and sometimes a couple of words in a caption, like the one above (I think your use of pictures to headline your articles, like this one, by the way, works really well.) "He needs a US push to do the right thing..." Wow! What more can you say?!
How about this: "...the US has a so-called ‘moral right to interfere in all other countries’ affairs in pursuit of what he’s convinced is the ‘greater good’." Yep, those twenty-five words carry the weight of at least a couple hundred.
But these are my favourites for today: "warmongering puppet".
Nice picture. (Not to be confused with today's favourite words.)
Why does a picture of Ursala von Lay-me(-not-them) keep popping into my head, like some bloody annoying tune ringing through your ears all day?
'Out, out, damn spot!'
"What, will these hands ne'er be clean?"
Never (is an awfully long time).