The Kremlin’s polar opposite reactions to these two documents, the Lula-endorsed UNGA Resolution that Moscow harshly condemned and President Xi’s peace plan that it enthusiastically supported, enable observers to better extrapolate each of those two BRICS countries’ geostrategic intentions. Lula has arguably recalibrated his worldview to more closely align with the US’, notwithstanding the latter’s agents of influence in Brazil lying that he hasn’t, while China is more confidently challenging the US.
What a comparison. China is a superpower with global interests and projection for which the end of the war is crucial in order to give continuity to the plans for the new Silk Road of Euro-Asian economic and trade integration. Brazil, on the other hand, is a regional power that still needs to accelerate and consolidate its development, which involves strengthening Latin American integration, before being able to really influence the situation on other continents.
OK. We all understand you don't trust Lula... There is no need to hammer it in every damn blog post, even when the subject is the time necessary for cooking pasta. Given I do not think the Chinese document is anywhere close or meant to be a peace proposal, but simply a "position paper", would you like to elaborate how the "territorial integrity" bit wil be worked out in a way that could satisfy Russia, who resonably integrated the Ukraine eastern regions and Crimea, and China, that want to avoid any precedent that could risk a referendum-dependent Taiwan or Tibet secessions?
Lula, The greatest ever! We love and support you always!
What a comparison. China is a superpower with global interests and projection for which the end of the war is crucial in order to give continuity to the plans for the new Silk Road of Euro-Asian economic and trade integration. Brazil, on the other hand, is a regional power that still needs to accelerate and consolidate its development, which involves strengthening Latin American integration, before being able to really influence the situation on other continents.
OK. We all understand you don't trust Lula... There is no need to hammer it in every damn blog post, even when the subject is the time necessary for cooking pasta. Given I do not think the Chinese document is anywhere close or meant to be a peace proposal, but simply a "position paper", would you like to elaborate how the "territorial integrity" bit wil be worked out in a way that could satisfy Russia, who resonably integrated the Ukraine eastern regions and Crimea, and China, that want to avoid any precedent that could risk a referendum-dependent Taiwan or Tibet secessions?