Its leadership had no choice but to curtail exports in order to avert a potential socio-economic and humanitarian catastrophe at home after unforeseen climatic conditions ravaged its rice crops earlier this year.
"The BBC explained “Why India's rice ban could trigger a global food crisis”, while CNBC declared that “India’s rice export ban to hurt millions globally. These countries will be the worst hit”."
What, nothing to do with their patrons' inability, or unwillingness, to support the UN and implement the 'grain deal' it had agreed to?
"The BBC explained “Why India's rice ban could trigger a global food crisis”, while CNBC declared that “India’s rice export ban to hurt millions globally. These countries will be the worst hit”."
What, nothing to do with their patrons' inability, or unwillingness, to support the UN and implement the 'grain deal' it had agreed to?