None of this would be happening had Bangladesh’s new Islamist-inspired ruling clique not been given a de facto blank check by the US to do whatever it wants for the purpose of provoking India.
Indo-Bangladeshi ties have worsened since the latter’s US-backed regime change in August, which led to an explosion in anti-Hindu violence that some consider to be a pogrom. The latest development concerned Bangladesh’s arrest of a Hindu monk for sedition after he was accused of disrespecting the national flag. This prompted India to officially express concern and wonder why the perpetrators of the aforesaid anti-Hindu violence remain at large, thus eliciting a strong reaction from Bangladesh.
This war of words basically boils down to India implying that Bangladesh’s new Islamist-influenced ruling clique is turning a blind eye to anti-Hindu violence for demagogic reasons while Bangladesh is implying that India is behaving hegemonically by meddling in its internal affairs. Objectively speaking, India has the right to be concerned about the spate of attacks against Hindus in this neighboring nation, while Bangladesh should prioritize stopping this violence over cracking down on a single dissident monk.
With this in mind, it compellingly appears as though Bangladesh is trying to bait India by letting this violence continue unabated while making a show out of arresting that religious minority figure, perhaps already having an escalation sequence in mind that it plans to employ after India makes the first move. Shortly after August’s regime change, Bangladesh ridiculously accused India of being responsible for its latest floods, though that didn’t provoke the hoped-for overreaction that Dhaka expected from Delhi.
This analysis here from that time argued that Bangladesh is looking for a pretext from India in order to once again host separatists and possibly give the US the naval base that former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina warned that it was trying to coerce from her shortly before she was overthrown. Going through with either dramatic move without the artificially manufactured perception that India placed Bangladesh in the position where it “felt that it had no choice” could expose the new ruling clique’s real agenda.
They were placed into power with American backing precisely because they’re expected to promulgate policies adversarial to India’s interests, thus enabling the US to exploit Bangladesh as a Hybrid War proxy against India as punishment for its refusal to distance itself from Russia. The US fears India’s astronomical rise over the nearly past three years as a globally significant Great Power and therefore hopes to weaponize Bangladesh to keep India in check like it earlier weaponized Ukraine vis-à-vis Russia.
The double standards on display regarding the US’ refusal to condemn the new ruling Bangladeshi clique’s blatant violations of democratic standards and human rights shows that it’s making notable exceptions to its traditional soft power policy in pursuit of the abovementioned strategic goals. This approach might change during Trump 2.0 given his team’s Indophilic disposition, but only if they can successfully counteract the influence of those “deep state” members who are behind this policy.
That’ll be easier said than done since Trump is known for being manipulatable so it’s possible that these same members might convince him that perpetuating his predecessor’s policy is supposedly in the US’ best interests. This might be done by claiming that it could pressure India into agreeing to lopsided terms on the trade deal that they’ve been negotiating for years already. It could also be spun as a means for coercing India into siding more with the US against China at the expense of its own best interests.
All in all, what’s happening right now in Bangladesh bodes ill for the future of its relations with India, but none of this would be happening had the new ruling clique not been given a de facto blank check by the US to do whatever it wants for the purpose of provoking India. Therefore, the only way that this will stop is if India convinces the US that this policy isn’t in its best interests, though Trump still might not be swayed so India should prepare for the worst just in case.
Another example of US foreign policy that supports blatant interference in the political processes of other nations. With the exception of the Israel lobby that controls much of US governance and its State Department, the US public will not tolerate any interference in its "democracy" by any other nation. American "exceptionalism" is plain for all not see.
"...cracking down on a single dissident monk."
But it's not about a single monk, is it? It's about being rewarded for identifying and isolating an other, having this behaviour tacitly ignored in the first case, establishing it as a pattern to be used, and MOST IMPORTANTLY allowing it to be rewarded by covert means ('corruption') to set the boundaries for the new state's/regime's/government's existence. This is how colour revolutions are made into 'stable' states, like the Ukraine, when the fireworks and shouting are over. После драки кулаками не машут. When the shouting and fireworks are over, a single dissident monk is just right.
"...Bangladesh is looking for a pretext..."
Hey, everybody needs to tout for work!
"...[the US] hopes to weaponize Bangladesh to keep India in check like it earlier weaponized Ukraine vis-à-vis Russia."
Almost as if they were incapable of learning — a deliberately (self-)retarded (restricted development — retard/advance) state; like the royal family and aristocracy in the UK. Gee, I wonder where they get it from? The ghosts of Culloden lie not silent!
"...only if they can successfully counteract the influence of those “deep state”..."
So, executions to take place in front of the Washington Monument: in time-honoured fashion they march toward their Bastille Day — 'The guillotine claims a bloody prize...'? Or are the Americans so much better than that? There's little evidence to demonstrate they've done enough work to avoid it.
"...Trump is known for being manipulatable..."
What, you mean like a narcissist? No! (NOT!) But, then, that means the 'Deep State' will be able to manipulate him too!? Maybe they should ALL be executed? Maybe they know that and hope to beat everybody else to the punch? Their escalation in the Ukraine certainly looks that way.
"...none of this would be happening had the new ruling clique not been..." Manipulated? No! (NOT!) Victims of the Victim-Perpetrator Bond. 'I will turn your face to alabaster, when you find your servant is your master.' Let's take it in turns and call it 'democracy'.
"...the only way that this will stop is..." Bastille Day!