You saw it in plain view with the spectacle that Zelensky made in the Oval Office. Zelensky has been in discussion with the globalists blob and they have what he considers a “better” deal than what the US was offering and he wants to keep fighting with Europe backing him. Trump is more than correct telling him he holds “no cards” in any peace deal. Ukraine cannot keep fighting no matter how much support he receives from the globalist blob. He is going to run out of citizens and Russia will never run out of soldiers. Trump is going against what the leftists want and he’s smart about it. He is trying to put a wedge in the Russia/China relationship which creates a stable world. Having a 2 on 1 where the US is out manned and going against 2 super powers doesn’t bode well for the world or the US for that matter. Diplomacy is sometimes ugly but Trump has used his 4 years off identifying all the globalists who have conspired against the US while infiltrating the deep state within the US. It’s why the left is going fucking nuts as he figured out how to drive a wooden stake through their hearts and it’s working according to plan. Perfectly.
He also said that the present situation was created by the effort and successes on the battlefield by the Russian Army... Which is the bigger message, including for the FSB: like "don't fuck it up boys, do your work and help so that all this effort done by the Army is not in vain and we can all finish it."
From day one of this conflict I openly stated and wrote: This can only end with a Russian victory or a nuclear war. And today, an American President looked into Zelenskyy’s slanted, drug-fueled eyes and told him twice: “You are gambling with WWIII.” Took them some time but they seem to be getting the point. This whole insane march of USA/NATO marching to the Russian border was just as dumb as 1918 when 16 different nations actually marched into Russia, into cities from Murmansk to Vladivostok, thinking that Siberia was ripe for the picking. They were shy even to write a single book in the West about this for over a century. And here comes Anna Reid with her book: A Nasty Little War, The Western intervention into the Russian Civil War. I see years of carefully collected, classified information there, brilliantly coming forward, placing the spotlight where it is needed, and filling the void that was kept there by censorship. A very readable book. (Amazon)
Thanks for info. I've been wondering when & if we in UsA would ever get the facts about that time in history. I've only seen bits & pieces about it. Glad someone finally did the research & chronicled the events.
After all that Putin has said about his encounters with USA presidents, we can be sure his awareness is keen on this. Yet, he has always been on the side of peace. Therefore, he will emphasize the possibility & rally public opinion this direction. The people, everywhere, also desire peace. It is only fear of being fooled ("again!") that makes us hesitate. We must step boldly in the direction we desire, ever watchful of pitfalls & deception, yet believing peace is possible & standing for it.
Let's see how the war/peace will unfold. If Ukraine gets totally defanged and with no ability to rearm itself, depleted of people, land, resources, and hating and not trusting anyone, not sure how this will work out... Because Europeans will in fact not fight if there is no guarantee backing from the Americans. After all, Trump told Starmer that "you can't take on Russia alone". Which is true. Other than acts of sabotage, what can Perfidious Albion do?
Ich traue den Anglo-Amerikanern nicht!. Siue haben Vietnam, Afghanistan, Irak, etc fasllen lassen und zerstört zurückgelassen. Je nach Vorteil. haben sie Verträge vbon heute auf morgen platzen lassen ... nein Danke, Verträge nur mit Absicherungen!
Where do the Chinese stand on this? When the US and Russia first began talking, China had insisted that European "stakeholders" needed to be at the negotiation table. And the sinophilic pundits (perhaps in fact Eurocommi stooges) on X continue to this days to impugn the sincerity of American rapprochement with Russia.
For the first time in half a decade there’s reason to be optimistic!
👍😊
You saw it in plain view with the spectacle that Zelensky made in the Oval Office. Zelensky has been in discussion with the globalists blob and they have what he considers a “better” deal than what the US was offering and he wants to keep fighting with Europe backing him. Trump is more than correct telling him he holds “no cards” in any peace deal. Ukraine cannot keep fighting no matter how much support he receives from the globalist blob. He is going to run out of citizens and Russia will never run out of soldiers. Trump is going against what the leftists want and he’s smart about it. He is trying to put a wedge in the Russia/China relationship which creates a stable world. Having a 2 on 1 where the US is out manned and going against 2 super powers doesn’t bode well for the world or the US for that matter. Diplomacy is sometimes ugly but Trump has used his 4 years off identifying all the globalists who have conspired against the US while infiltrating the deep state within the US. It’s why the left is going fucking nuts as he figured out how to drive a wooden stake through their hearts and it’s working according to plan. Perfectly.
He also said that the present situation was created by the effort and successes on the battlefield by the Russian Army... Which is the bigger message, including for the FSB: like "don't fuck it up boys, do your work and help so that all this effort done by the Army is not in vain and we can all finish it."
From day one of this conflict I openly stated and wrote: This can only end with a Russian victory or a nuclear war. And today, an American President looked into Zelenskyy’s slanted, drug-fueled eyes and told him twice: “You are gambling with WWIII.” Took them some time but they seem to be getting the point. This whole insane march of USA/NATO marching to the Russian border was just as dumb as 1918 when 16 different nations actually marched into Russia, into cities from Murmansk to Vladivostok, thinking that Siberia was ripe for the picking. They were shy even to write a single book in the West about this for over a century. And here comes Anna Reid with her book: A Nasty Little War, The Western intervention into the Russian Civil War. I see years of carefully collected, classified information there, brilliantly coming forward, placing the spotlight where it is needed, and filling the void that was kept there by censorship. A very readable book. (Amazon)
Thanks for info. I've been wondering when & if we in UsA would ever get the facts about that time in history. I've only seen bits & pieces about it. Glad someone finally did the research & chronicled the events.
After all that Putin has said about his encounters with USA presidents, we can be sure his awareness is keen on this. Yet, he has always been on the side of peace. Therefore, he will emphasize the possibility & rally public opinion this direction. The people, everywhere, also desire peace. It is only fear of being fooled ("again!") that makes us hesitate. We must step boldly in the direction we desire, ever watchful of pitfalls & deception, yet believing peace is possible & standing for it.
When will LNG sanctions be rescinded?
Minsk-3, here we come!
Let's see how the war/peace will unfold. If Ukraine gets totally defanged and with no ability to rearm itself, depleted of people, land, resources, and hating and not trusting anyone, not sure how this will work out... Because Europeans will in fact not fight if there is no guarantee backing from the Americans. After all, Trump told Starmer that "you can't take on Russia alone". Which is true. Other than acts of sabotage, what can Perfidious Albion do?
Expect "shocking new evidence of Russian atrocities ZOMG!" In 5..4..3..2..1.
Maybe Zelenskii will get a puppy.
Ich traue den Anglo-Amerikanern nicht!. Siue haben Vietnam, Afghanistan, Irak, etc fasllen lassen und zerstört zurückgelassen. Je nach Vorteil. haben sie Verträge vbon heute auf morgen platzen lassen ... nein Danke, Verträge nur mit Absicherungen!
Where do the Chinese stand on this? When the US and Russia first began talking, China had insisted that European "stakeholders" needed to be at the negotiation table. And the sinophilic pundits (perhaps in fact Eurocommi stooges) on X continue to this days to impugn the sincerity of American rapprochement with Russia.
The US cannot be trusted. Putin will end this on the battlefield.