The western mainstream media has completely blacked out all references to Lt Gen Igor Kirilov's Yeoman's role in unravelling and highlighting the American deep state's involvement in WMD project (Barbadosa doctrine) and bio-weapon labs (novel viruses geared for targetting humans from specific races) in Ukraine. Instead, news about his assasination in the western media opens with mention about his alleged role in masterminding "chemical weapons attacks" on Ukrainian soldiers, for which he has been sanctioned by Britain as it seems.
Unless Russia takes initiative to arise, awake and hit the nerve centres of Anglo Saxon bullies real hard where it hurts most, the Western cabal has already drafted ambitious plans to hunt down leading Russian nationals and subject them to kangaroo trials in courts on NATO soil in the fashion of Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevich with the motive of heaping mass-ridicule and humiliation upon the Russian civilisation.
Right now, a criminal investigation, involving both MI5 and Scotland Yard is underway in Britain, pertaining to some British mercenary who had been accidentally killed from friendly fire whilst serving in Ukraine. The British government and its investigating agencies are trying to cook up a false case incriminating select Russian nationals for having plotted the "assasination" of that mercenary, and plan to sound Interpol for issuance of a red corner notice very soon. At the same time, the guilt of the conspirators to murder of Russian General Igor Kirilov is being trivialised and even glorified even as that gentleman is being demonised as a cohort of "chemical Ali". Russia can take a cue from Britain in preparing its own hit list of fugitives deserving of death-row from among British and EU nationals.
Ugh, not another lurker who was so offended by my past choice of a single word that they're now obsessed with me and waited several months to make a scene, how bizarre.
But to answer your question, sure, both are audacious (here's a reminder of the definition since you seem to falsely conflate it with approval when it's a neutral term: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/audacious), but the pager assassinations were much more audacious since they took years to plan and targeted thousands.
Now it's your term to answer my questions, and if you don't reciprocate the respect that I gave you by giving my very limited time by answering by tonight, then you'll be blocked.
Why did it bother you so much that you lurked for 2,5 months not saying anything till now in response to my description of the pager assassinations as audacious? What about that word bothers you so much? Did you wrongly conflate it with approval? I psychoanalyze my haters for fun, it's one of my hobbies and has been for years.
I want to understand how Resistance trolls since I now have more of them than "NAFO" trolls. Resistance ones are worse though since they discredit Alt-Media.
Is it that you're so angry about what happened that you're using me as a strawman to rant against? What's your thought process in popping up out of nowhere 2,5 months later to make that sarcastic comment. Is this some kinda "gotcha" moment in your mind? If so, to what end? To "discredit" me? How? What tangible consequences do you anticipate?
Did you think I'd argue that this assassination wasn't audacious either? Or that I'd change my mind on how I described the pager assassinations? Why do you even care?
“Resistance trolls” good description of those fake leftists who feign support for Palestine while condemning Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. This schizophrenic opinion is widespread in the UK where it is leveraged by NAFO trolls and State agencies to good effect in fracturing the anti war anti imperialist movements. The obvious contradiction is apparent in concluding this stance is used by these NAFO trolls to advertise and confuse ‘Pro Palestine Pro Ukraine’.
No, I am not upset with your use of audacious, which I didn't know you'd even used until I went back and checked. I wondered how you characterized the Israeli assassinations compared to the Ukrainian one, is all. And I agree that the Israeli ones were more audacious because of the planning and scope. I don't agree that the Ukrainian assassination was cowardly, though. I enjoy your column but your prejudices sometime rather spoil them. Happy holidays to you and your family.
Ok, thanks for clarifying, fair enough. I've been targeted by a lot of Resistance trolls on X these past few weeks so I'm expecting them to soon invade and toxify this space too. Happy holidays to you and yours too.
The western mainstream media has completely blacked out all references to Lt Gen Igor Kirilov's Yeoman's role in unravelling and highlighting the American deep state's involvement in WMD project (Barbadosa doctrine) and bio-weapon labs (novel viruses geared for targetting humans from specific races) in Ukraine. Instead, news about his assasination in the western media opens with mention about his alleged role in masterminding "chemical weapons attacks" on Ukrainian soldiers, for which he has been sanctioned by Britain as it seems.
Unless Russia takes initiative to arise, awake and hit the nerve centres of Anglo Saxon bullies real hard where it hurts most, the Western cabal has already drafted ambitious plans to hunt down leading Russian nationals and subject them to kangaroo trials in courts on NATO soil in the fashion of Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevich with the motive of heaping mass-ridicule and humiliation upon the Russian civilisation.
Right now, a criminal investigation, involving both MI5 and Scotland Yard is underway in Britain, pertaining to some British mercenary who had been accidentally killed from friendly fire whilst serving in Ukraine. The British government and its investigating agencies are trying to cook up a false case incriminating select Russian nationals for having plotted the "assasination" of that mercenary, and plan to sound Interpol for issuance of a red corner notice very soon. At the same time, the guilt of the conspirators to murder of Russian General Igor Kirilov is being trivialised and even glorified even as that gentleman is being demonised as a cohort of "chemical Ali". Russia can take a cue from Britain in preparing its own hit list of fugitives deserving of death-row from among British and EU nationals.
Why is the Ukrainian assassination 'cowardly' yet you say the Israeli assassinations were 'audacious?' I don't see a difference.
Ugh, not another lurker who was so offended by my past choice of a single word that they're now obsessed with me and waited several months to make a scene, how bizarre.
But to answer your question, sure, both are audacious (here's a reminder of the definition since you seem to falsely conflate it with approval when it's a neutral term: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/audacious), but the pager assassinations were much more audacious since they took years to plan and targeted thousands.
Now it's your term to answer my questions, and if you don't reciprocate the respect that I gave you by giving my very limited time by answering by tonight, then you'll be blocked.
Why did it bother you so much that you lurked for 2,5 months not saying anything till now in response to my description of the pager assassinations as audacious? What about that word bothers you so much? Did you wrongly conflate it with approval? I psychoanalyze my haters for fun, it's one of my hobbies and has been for years.
I want to understand how Resistance trolls since I now have more of them than "NAFO" trolls. Resistance ones are worse though since they discredit Alt-Media.
Is it that you're so angry about what happened that you're using me as a strawman to rant against? What's your thought process in popping up out of nowhere 2,5 months later to make that sarcastic comment. Is this some kinda "gotcha" moment in your mind? If so, to what end? To "discredit" me? How? What tangible consequences do you anticipate?
Did you think I'd argue that this assassination wasn't audacious either? Or that I'd change my mind on how I described the pager assassinations? Why do you even care?
“Resistance trolls” good description of those fake leftists who feign support for Palestine while condemning Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. This schizophrenic opinion is widespread in the UK where it is leveraged by NAFO trolls and State agencies to good effect in fracturing the anti war anti imperialist movements. The obvious contradiction is apparent in concluding this stance is used by these NAFO trolls to advertise and confuse ‘Pro Palestine Pro Ukraine’.
Abby Martin, Amy Goodman, CJ Werlemann and whole lots of rabidly radical yet pretentious Islamists.
No, I am not upset with your use of audacious, which I didn't know you'd even used until I went back and checked. I wondered how you characterized the Israeli assassinations compared to the Ukrainian one, is all. And I agree that the Israeli ones were more audacious because of the planning and scope. I don't agree that the Ukrainian assassination was cowardly, though. I enjoy your column but your prejudices sometime rather spoil them. Happy holidays to you and your family.
Ok, thanks for clarifying, fair enough. I've been targeted by a lot of Resistance trolls on X these past few weeks so I'm expecting them to soon invade and toxify this space too. Happy holidays to you and yours too.