13 Comments
User's avatar
Feral Finster's avatar

This assumes that Musk will even be formally or informally part of the administration in May.

Expand full comment
barnabus's avatar

Informally, he is very much part of this administration. Even formally, the provision of starlink over battle areas in Ukraine would count as very much material support to one side.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

There is not even an administration to be part of, yet.

Expand full comment
barnabus's avatar

Yep, 8 days wait lol

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Remember how in 2016, people were panicking over Steve Bannon? How long did he last? A couple months, if that?

Expand full comment
barnabus's avatar

Musk isn't Bannon. He is speaking for a large part of Big Tech. Besides, #47 starts getting purchase amongst the conservative Dems like Fetterman.

This didn't happen in 2017. But then, USA then didn't yet lose the war in Ukraine or have seen the pro-Hamas demonstrations at University campuses.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Bannon wasn't some nobody, either.

Expand full comment
Nakayama's avatar

European countries have the right to ban X or restrict its corporate behavior per national sovereign. Since Trump likely will serve only one term but Elon Musk will be forced to deal with EU for many years to come, it is better for X to comply with official government laws and contest unfair administrative moves in European courts rather than frontal confrontations. As for Poland, President Trump merely needs to consider US national interest. Having a forward missile base is nice, but a constant provocation to the Russian Bear is definitely against the national interest. If US is willing to withdraw from Ukraine, US should seriously consider withdraw military forces and installation from Poland and move them back to Germany or all the way home.

Maybe X can offer a great discount to all X users to buy and use VPN. X may as well buy out a small VPN vendor outright, to produce an X-only VPN front-end.

Expand full comment
kartheek's avatar

US doesn't need any bases near russia just like russia doesn't have any. Russia doesn't have any interest to invade any country including NATO ones. USA can deter from afar with its ICBM's and Submarines.

But the imperialists are imperialists and they want bases for forward operations,spying ,bribing etc.,

Expand full comment
Nakayama's avatar

Exactly. I am simply not optimistic to get US missiles out of Poland. However, it would be a great gesture to promote a longer-term peace. I do not believe Trump can achieve that even if he wants to. As for withdrawing from Germany or other places of Europe, that is beyond my imagination. No empire ever sunsets itself without a fight.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 10
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Andrew Korybko's avatar

Imagine thinking that they aren't nationalists or conservatives in relative comparison to their elite opponents, who are liberals and globalists.

Do you have any constructive feedback about the substance of my analysis or are you just going to troll more since you're triggered by a few words?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 10
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Andrew Korybko's avatar

I don't know who you are but you're more than welcome to share your relevant academic and professional credentials if you're trying to humiliate me or whatever.

I explained why I over-simplified my description of them, which to reiterate, is to make the contrast between them and their official political opponents more easily understandable for casual observers.

I don't need to defend my stylistic choices that I do with the best of intentions. If you're going to continue insulting me by implying that I'm not a serious analyst, then you don't have to follow my work and should go elsewhere instead.

I'm not going to self-censor or change my views just because a random person who I've never heard of before and don't care even exists posted something disrespectful on my page. Get real, grow up, and stop projecting.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Jan 10
Expand full comment
Andrew Korybko's avatar

Wrong, you were very sarcastic in your first post and then you implied that I'm not a "serious analyst".

I don't mind constructive critiques and contrarian views -- I encourage them actually -- I only ask that they're respectful.

But when you personally insult me, that's unacceptable and is why you'll now be blocked so make sure you'll never toxify another of my threads.

Expand full comment