The US is forming two Asian trilaterals with itself and Japan that are centered on the Philippines in Southeast Asia and South Korea in Northeast Asia.
It’s no secret that the US is preparing to “Pivot (back) to Asia” in order to more muscularly contain China, but few have paid attention to the form in which this is expected to take in the coming future. Instead of the US doing so on its own or through the previously assembled Quad of itself, Australia, India, and Japan, it’s increasingly relying on the Squad. This framework swaps India out for the Philippines, and its latest relevant development was the clinching of a Japanese-Philippine military logistics pact.
That agreement follows April’s first-ever trilateral US-Japanese-Philippine summit, which tightened the US’ containment noose around China, and came approximately nine months after those three’s National Security Advisors met for the first time ever in June 2023. In practice, Japan will likely ramp up its military exercises with the Philippines and explore more arms deals, with those two possibly also roping Taiwan into their activities to an uncertain extent in the future given that it’s roughly equidistant between them.
This will increase the chances of a conflict by miscalculation since China has already recently shown that it has the political will to respond to violations of the maritime territory that it claims as its own as proven by its latest low-intensify clashes with the Philippines. Even though the US has mutual defense obligations to the Philippines and has recently reminded China of them, it’s been reluctant to meaningfully act on its commitments for de-escalation reasons, but that could easily change.
After all, the US would be pressured to respond if China clashes with both its Japanese and Philippine allies in the event that they jointly violate the maritime territory that Beijing claims as its own, though they might of course abstain from such a provocation for the time being for whatever reason. In any case, it can’t be ruled out that something of the sort might eventually transpire, which could prompt a dangerous brinksmanship crisis that risks spiraling out of control if cooler heads on all sides don’t prevail.
Southeast Asia isn’t the only battleground in the Sino-US dimension of the New Cold War since Northeast Asia is rapidly shaping up to be a complementary one as well. North Korea recently accused the US, South Korea, and Japan of conspiring to create an “Asian NATO” after their latest trilateral drills. South Korea is a prime candidate for joining the Squad, which can also be described as AUKUS+, with Japan playing the senior partner role in that scenario exactly as it now plays with the Philippines.
That likely won’t happen anytime soon though since the South Koreans remain resentful of Japan’s World War II-era occupation that Tokyo hasn’t ever taken full responsibility for in their view. Trilateral drills under America’s aegis are one thing, but entering into a military-logistics pact with their former colonizer is an altogether different matter, especially if it leads to the latter gaining the upper hand. Nevertheless, South Korea is expected to scale up its role in AUKUS+, with Japan as its top Asian partner.
The grand strategic trend is that the US is forming two Asian trilaterals with itself and Japan that are centered on the Philippines in Southeast Asia and South Korea in Northeast Asia. Australia’s role is largely symbolic for the time being, and these two trilaterals haven’t yet merged into a multilateral defense network along the lines of NATO, but the writing is on the wall. It’s unclear how China will respond to these moves, but there’s no doubt that they make the New Cold War much more dangerous.
I don't understand all this 'high level' geopolitical/military posturing and manoeuvring. Seems bloody stupid and dangerous to me. Big idiot bullies swaggering around the place on my money destroying things here and there. 'Contain China'. What? Physically contain from land expansion? I don't think China wants to expand does it? In that way.
But in another way: influence in the world, growth, advancement: it wants to expand. And here's the point isn't it, it is doing it. It is expanding at great speed, together with all of BRICS.
There's about two billion people right there who're all advancing as quickly as they can go with a bright future ahead of them barring accidents.
And there's the malevolent USA with a mere 350 million dupes trying to stop it all.
Look ludicrous to me.
A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words.
To get a big picture understanding of global conflict you only have to look at some maps of major oil and gas deposits and their transit routes. Wherever you find conflict, you inevitably find either a major gas or oil field, or a significant transit route. The basic idea, going all the way back to WWI (which can be characterized by the emergence of oil to replace coal as a transportation fuel) is to control the world's energy resources, either via direct ownership at the wellhead, or the ability to interdict shipping routes or pipelines.
I include a few maps as examples, but do some searches on your own for different regions and see what you find. Wherever there's war or civil strife, there's almost always a pipeline or major energy resource involved.
In the current context, future Russian energy supplies to China are a game changer in the sense that it will be useless to interdict the energy sea route from the Middle East to China. China is expanding its naval presence to protect that route for now, which is also vital for commercial shipping, but energy and later commercial goods will soon be travelling by land across the New Silk Road currently being built, thus negating or at least reducing the risk to China's economy.
Read up on Mackinder's Heartland Theory to get an idea of the stakes.
The West tipped its hand by destroying Nordstream2. That was an act of desperation meant to prevent the emergence of a German-Russian energy/technology nexus - same motive as WWII. However, Russia has a new partner to replace Germany, and that's why the focus on China.
Ironically much of the technology and manufacturing output of China (which they trade for energy) was provided by the USA over the last few decades. China followed the example of Japan in capturing western markets, first with cheap consumer goods, then moving up the value chain to displace technology and engineering products that were formerly major exports of the USA and EU. Japan also figures in this equation with much of their manufacturing now being done in China. The good thus produced are not the shoddy products you find in Walmart. They are made to Japanese standards which costs more, but Japanese consumers prefer quality to price. Clothing is one example. First rate threads made in China can be bought in Japan, so if you visit Japan, travel light and buy lots of clothes when you get there!
OK, here are a few maps.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d6/1e/bc/d61ebc19f39134862b5f8c91e39b2559.jpg
https://www.eia.gov/international/content/analysis/special_topics/World_Oil_Transit_Chokepoints/images/figure1.png
https://mondediplo.com/local/cache-vignettes/L890xH851/lmd_0521_13_gazoducs_rgb-a710b-39eca.jpg?1619690877
https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/plattscontent/_assets/_images/latest-news/20200113_pipelinemap.jpg
https://www.eurotrib.com/files/3/060322_Russia_China_gas_routes.gif
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-sBBSWMcO5IU/VRjZtqftZbI/AAAAAAAAcZE/6a2WGVrb6LE/s1600/Uranium_Reserves.png
As a footnote, also pay attention to the electrical distribution networks from an economic and military standpoint. Right now the Baltic states are agitating for a new Maginot Line to prevent a Russian invasion, which is absurd on its face. Why would Russia invade those sad-ass countries when they can just knock out their energy grid, as is being done in Ukraine? Pipelines are one thing, but if you can't move the electricity around you'll be eating cold Spam by candlelight.