Discussion about this post

User's avatar
arthur brogard's avatar

I don't understand all this 'high level' geopolitical/military posturing and manoeuvring. Seems bloody stupid and dangerous to me. Big idiot bullies swaggering around the place on my money destroying things here and there. 'Contain China'. What? Physically contain from land expansion? I don't think China wants to expand does it? In that way.

But in another way: influence in the world, growth, advancement: it wants to expand. And here's the point isn't it, it is doing it. It is expanding at great speed, together with all of BRICS.

There's about two billion people right there who're all advancing as quickly as they can go with a bright future ahead of them barring accidents.

And there's the malevolent USA with a mere 350 million dupes trying to stop it all.

Look ludicrous to me.

Expand full comment
ebear's avatar

A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words.

To get a big picture understanding of global conflict you only have to look at some maps of major oil and gas deposits and their transit routes. Wherever you find conflict, you inevitably find either a major gas or oil field, or a significant transit route. The basic idea, going all the way back to WWI (which can be characterized by the emergence of oil to replace coal as a transportation fuel) is to control the world's energy resources, either via direct ownership at the wellhead, or the ability to interdict shipping routes or pipelines.

I include a few maps as examples, but do some searches on your own for different regions and see what you find. Wherever there's war or civil strife, there's almost always a pipeline or major energy resource involved.

In the current context, future Russian energy supplies to China are a game changer in the sense that it will be useless to interdict the energy sea route from the Middle East to China. China is expanding its naval presence to protect that route for now, which is also vital for commercial shipping, but energy and later commercial goods will soon be travelling by land across the New Silk Road currently being built, thus negating or at least reducing the risk to China's economy.

Read up on Mackinder's Heartland Theory to get an idea of the stakes.

The West tipped its hand by destroying Nordstream2. That was an act of desperation meant to prevent the emergence of a German-Russian energy/technology nexus - same motive as WWII. However, Russia has a new partner to replace Germany, and that's why the focus on China.

Ironically much of the technology and manufacturing output of China (which they trade for energy) was provided by the USA over the last few decades. China followed the example of Japan in capturing western markets, first with cheap consumer goods, then moving up the value chain to displace technology and engineering products that were formerly major exports of the USA and EU. Japan also figures in this equation with much of their manufacturing now being done in China. The good thus produced are not the shoddy products you find in Walmart. They are made to Japanese standards which costs more, but Japanese consumers prefer quality to price. Clothing is one example. First rate threads made in China can be bought in Japan, so if you visit Japan, travel light and buy lots of clothes when you get there!

OK, here are a few maps.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d6/1e/bc/d61ebc19f39134862b5f8c91e39b2559.jpg

https://www.eia.gov/international/content/analysis/special_topics/World_Oil_Transit_Chokepoints/images/figure1.png

https://mondediplo.com/local/cache-vignettes/L890xH851/lmd_0521_13_gazoducs_rgb-a710b-39eca.jpg?1619690877

https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/plattscontent/_assets/_images/latest-news/20200113_pipelinemap.jpg

https://www.eurotrib.com/files/3/060322_Russia_China_gas_routes.gif

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-sBBSWMcO5IU/VRjZtqftZbI/AAAAAAAAcZE/6a2WGVrb6LE/s1600/Uranium_Reserves.png

As a footnote, also pay attention to the electrical distribution networks from an economic and military standpoint. Right now the Baltic states are agitating for a new Maginot Line to prevent a Russian invasion, which is absurd on its face. Why would Russia invade those sad-ass countries when they can just knock out their energy grid, as is being done in Ukraine? Pipelines are one thing, but if you can't move the electricity around you'll be eating cold Spam by candlelight.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts