In terms of the bigger picture, the UK definitely wants to play a long-term and highly strategic role in Ukraine, but the extent to which it can execute its lofty plans as contained in last January’s “security guarantee” pact and their latest rehash last week largely depends on the US.
We're not still going on about the WEF hypocrites, their young leader's 2 week jolly as though it was James Bond style mind control and fake globalist plot are we?
Starmer is the puppet of the US deep state who are the puppets of Exxon mobil, Raytheon, Cahill, Bayer and Pfizer. He is not the puppet of virtue signallers in Switzerland, vegans, environmentalists nor the toothless UN.
Hey Jo it is all part of the grooming for the oligarchs and transnational entities, their schooling especially if English boarding school all put them under the spell ready to play their well paid role.
Hiya rakyat, Yes, we’re all brought up under the White, western patriarchy. The patriarchy rewards dominance (or submission) over women, non-Whites, other animals and the environment. Uk politicians are disproportionately represented by the most successful in the patriarchy ie men who have attended Eton and the Bullingdon Club at Oxford. Here they cement networks and also destroy parts of their souls in order to succeed. The transnationals are also made up of people driven to succeed at any cost, though not always through the same route, a lot of the time they are part of organised crime.
The WEF is not part of this grooming. It’s a virtue signalling and greenwashing front. It is a hoax to make you think that either a) transnationals are addressing environmental issues so we needn’t worry or b) there is a left-wing oligarchy with a green agenda wanting to depopulate and control us so that we support the rights of transnationals to avoid any regulation that hinders their profits.
An oxymoron Jo, a left wing oligarchy, but yes that is the attempted story but how do people accept it or even consider believing it in the first place. Beggars belief. Thanks for your reply.
Thanks Rakyat. Yes, exactly: a left wing oligarchy is an oxymoron. Yet this is the cognitive dissonance that must be held in place by those accepting the WEF globalist plot. Oligarchs seeking to depopulate and control the world (especially the West, their biggest market) so much so that these same oligarchs lose all of their pensions, wealth and power? It doesn’t make any sense.
At least my (our?) theory makes sense. That oil oligarchs created a WEF/left/woke depopulation control plot to get people to continue to support oil in the face of climate change. That so many have fallen for it and we’ve ended up with a racist, sexist climate crisis denier in the White House is truly testament to their skills in targeting social media.
Someone must have made a typographical error. They probably meant a "10-Week Partnership." Because that's about how long both Ukraine and Starmer can be expected to last.
It is strange that Russia still did not bomb all bridges on Dniepr, Dniestr and Bug, as well all border crossing with Poland and Romania. I expected that Russia will bomb embassies of uk, israhell, finland, sweden, estonia, lithuania and latvia in Kiev. What a lost opportunity, which may leads to the destruction of Russia.
It would take an overly broad interpretation of what Article 5 means to be able to conclude that British forces being attacked in an existing war zone would trigger the clause.
Article 5 means all 32 NATO members agree. Each member decides what response it will provide.
Starmer is an incompetent idiot, even by the ridiculously low standards of WEF useful glove puppets.
We're not still going on about the WEF hypocrites, their young leader's 2 week jolly as though it was James Bond style mind control and fake globalist plot are we?
Starmer is the puppet of the US deep state who are the puppets of Exxon mobil, Raytheon, Cahill, Bayer and Pfizer. He is not the puppet of virtue signallers in Switzerland, vegans, environmentalists nor the toothless UN.
Hey Jo it is all part of the grooming for the oligarchs and transnational entities, their schooling especially if English boarding school all put them under the spell ready to play their well paid role.
Hiya rakyat, Yes, we’re all brought up under the White, western patriarchy. The patriarchy rewards dominance (or submission) over women, non-Whites, other animals and the environment. Uk politicians are disproportionately represented by the most successful in the patriarchy ie men who have attended Eton and the Bullingdon Club at Oxford. Here they cement networks and also destroy parts of their souls in order to succeed. The transnationals are also made up of people driven to succeed at any cost, though not always through the same route, a lot of the time they are part of organised crime.
The WEF is not part of this grooming. It’s a virtue signalling and greenwashing front. It is a hoax to make you think that either a) transnationals are addressing environmental issues so we needn’t worry or b) there is a left-wing oligarchy with a green agenda wanting to depopulate and control us so that we support the rights of transnationals to avoid any regulation that hinders their profits.
An oxymoron Jo, a left wing oligarchy, but yes that is the attempted story but how do people accept it or even consider believing it in the first place. Beggars belief. Thanks for your reply.
Thanks Rakyat. Yes, exactly: a left wing oligarchy is an oxymoron. Yet this is the cognitive dissonance that must be held in place by those accepting the WEF globalist plot. Oligarchs seeking to depopulate and control the world (especially the West, their biggest market) so much so that these same oligarchs lose all of their pensions, wealth and power? It doesn’t make any sense.
At least my (our?) theory makes sense. That oil oligarchs created a WEF/left/woke depopulation control plot to get people to continue to support oil in the face of climate change. That so many have fallen for it and we’ve ended up with a racist, sexist climate crisis denier in the White House is truly testament to their skills in targeting social media.
Well, duh. British "Empire" is becoming like the Baltic chihuahuas. Even the US doesn't want Ukraine in NATO, then what can the UK do for Ukraine?
Someone must have made a typographical error. They probably meant a "10-Week Partnership." Because that's about how long both Ukraine and Starmer can be expected to last.
You’ve elated, actually no, more accurately you’ve abated some of my anger when I saw this touted in the UK press, thank you.
Lol. Yes, it's a stunt performed exactly as well as one would expect from a puppet. You can practically see the strings.
It is strange that Russia still did not bomb all bridges on Dniepr, Dniestr and Bug, as well all border crossing with Poland and Romania. I expected that Russia will bomb embassies of uk, israhell, finland, sweden, estonia, lithuania and latvia in Kiev. What a lost opportunity, which may leads to the destruction of Russia.
It's easier to cross sturdy Soviet bridges than it is to place pontoon bridges.
Attacking an embassy is the same as an attack on the homeland. You are either dense or purposefully provocative.
The weapons manufacturers want to continue their grifting.
What security guarantees? Why don't they give them now, send all their armies there, in Donbas now. It is pathetic.
If it's just a publicity stunt, why does it deserve an article?
It would take an overly broad interpretation of what Article 5 means to be able to conclude that British forces being attacked in an existing war zone would trigger the clause.
Article 5 means all 32 NATO members agree. Each member decides what response it will provide.