As this dispute continues spiraling, observers will be able to more easily discern those two’s diametrically opposed worldviews, especially since other countries are expected to take sides even if only informally.
This is outrageous. "Countries" do not have world views. Classes and people might. "India" does not mean an extreme right-wing government promoting the fascistic theocratic ideology of "Hindutva," nor "Canada" a colonially originated capitalist regime. "Terrorism" and "Separatism" are all-purpose slanders whose use condemns *any* state as arbitrarily repressive. 'National Security" is an all-purpose label for any crime, domestic or foreign, that the security apparatus of a state is directed to commit.
This is outrageous. "Countries" do not have world views. Classes and people might. "India" does not mean an extreme right-wing government promoting the fascistic theocratic ideology of "Hindutva," nor "Canada" a colonially originated capitalist regime. "Terrorism" and "Separatism" are all-purpose slanders whose use condemns *any* state as arbitrarily repressive. 'National Security" is an all-purpose label for any crime, domestic or foreign, that the security apparatus of a state is directed to commit.