There are plenty of other ways to rekindle the Western public’s interest in the Ukrainian Conflict without disgustingly misportraying literal jihadis (in the words of Sky News’ Dominic Waghorn prior to them being removed like Breitbart reported) as supposed heroes. Far from convincing average folks that Kiev’s cause is supposedly as righteous as their officials claim, this will indisputably have the effect of provoking maximum suspicion from all those who realize that their taxpayer funds are being spent to finance anti-Russian suicide-bombing terrorists.
The West, in particular the anglofascist USofA, have a long history of following the old but fallacious adage: "the enemy of my enemy is my friend".
Examples include: the mujaheddin against Russia, the IS against Assad and Russia, the Kurds against the IS, the Taliban agsins Al Qaeda, the mujaheddin e khalq agains Iran, Khomeini against the Shah, the muslim brothers against Sadat, Saddam against Iran, the list is sheer endless.
The result is always the same, the former "friends" turn out to be enemies. This will happen with the Chechen terrorists.
This is due to an entirely wrong understanding of the relationships "friendship" and "enmity".
To establish the relationship of "friend" between all/two parties, both must agree. Before, the rejstiovship is at best open. It is a symmetric relationship.
Not so with "enemy". Only one single party is necessary to establish enmity. The relationship is asymmetric.
Symmetric and asymmetric relationships are a priori not comparable. Therefore, a reverse conclusion - as stated in the above adage - is not permissable.
What makes these chechens any more terrorist than Ukrainians fighting the Russians or the Russians destroying electricity hubs to leave civilians cold and freezing. This is a purely Islamophobic post. Much like western references to Russians as orcs.
Just another clue that suicide-bombers of al queda had nothing to do with 9/11. The US deep state will do almost anything to manufacture a war.
The West, in particular the anglofascist USofA, have a long history of following the old but fallacious adage: "the enemy of my enemy is my friend".
Examples include: the mujaheddin against Russia, the IS against Assad and Russia, the Kurds against the IS, the Taliban agsins Al Qaeda, the mujaheddin e khalq agains Iran, Khomeini against the Shah, the muslim brothers against Sadat, Saddam against Iran, the list is sheer endless.
The result is always the same, the former "friends" turn out to be enemies. This will happen with the Chechen terrorists.
This is due to an entirely wrong understanding of the relationships "friendship" and "enmity".
To establish the relationship of "friend" between all/two parties, both must agree. Before, the rejstiovship is at best open. It is a symmetric relationship.
Not so with "enemy". Only one single party is necessary to establish enmity. The relationship is asymmetric.
Symmetric and asymmetric relationships are a priori not comparable. Therefore, a reverse conclusion - as stated in the above adage - is not permissable.
A simple error of reasoning but oft repeated!
What makes these chechens any more terrorist than Ukrainians fighting the Russians or the Russians destroying electricity hubs to leave civilians cold and freezing. This is a purely Islamophobic post. Much like western references to Russians as orcs.