6 Comments

"...(whether he actually did or not)."

Hey, when ya got a nose-n-head full o' coke... And can't do a damn thing without it... Anything's possible!

"...soft-peddling the scenario of Ukraine building nukes..."

Coke 'n Nukes — what a wonderful idea, a truly awe-inspiring inspiration; like something out of a Moron McCain let's-retard-our-imagination-and-development-to-perceiving-Russia-as-a-gas-station playbook. Give that man a kewpie doll with his Nobel Prize!

Coke 'n Nukes, like apple pie and Chevrolet; they just go together naturally, like pianos and penises.

Expand full comment

In years to come, seeing an image of zelensky will be enough to put many off the idea of engagement with Bolivian marching powder. However, the uber coke nuts stateside will forever idolise this freak as they still now do with 'Scarface' fictional character from the 80s.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I think it was Edison, of 99%-perspiration-and-1%-inspiration fame, who reckoned the people who'd ripped of his idea to make Hollywood were pretty good at fiction. Turns out they're just as good at genocide. Like love and marriage: can't have one without the other! Fiction and Genocide, Coke 'n Nukes... Yeah, it's got that ring about it.

But yeah, I can see somebody making a living selling T-shirts with Zelensky's face like Scarface's above the line, 'Dick Off My Piano!'.

Expand full comment

How can anybody listen to that idiot and coke wreak ? Ukraine is not member of NATO or EU. So why are they in the country and support them with billion of dollars and weapons? Most normal thinking people know that Russia have won the war long time ago. But the terror organization NATO have just decided to expand their support to Ukraine It’s totally insane and waste of money and lives

Expand full comment

More likely, you've just heard part of Zelenskii's secret victory plan. Yes, the United States is entirely on-board.

Meanwhle, Russia continues to dither.

Expand full comment

Why haven’t you addressed the Russian-Iran-Israel triangle again? Given that your previous comments were questionable as I pointed out at the time.

Expand full comment